Files
Conor Nolan 91dc4f7f74 Update Topology Manager for 1.18 (#19050)
* [WIP] Update Topology Manager for 1.18

Move from Alpha to Beta.
Remove Known Limitation - fixed in 1.18.

* Nit: Update content/en/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/topology-manager.md

Co-Authored-By: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com>

* Add section on feature gate with version guidance.

* Add Known Limitation on Memory/Hugepages

* Update content/en/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/topology-manager.md

Clean up wording of known limitations

Co-Authored-By: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com>

* Edits to feature gate description based on review

* Up date feature gates table.

Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com>
2020-03-14 08:12:35 -07:00

191 lines
8.9 KiB
Markdown

---
title: Control Topology Management Policies on a node
reviewers:
- ConnorDoyle
- klueska
- lmdaly
- nolancon
content_template: templates/task
min-kubernetes-server-version: v1.18
---
{{% capture overview %}}
{{< feature-state state="beta" >}}
An increasing number of systems leverage a combination of CPUs and hardware accelerators to support latency-critical execution and high-throughput parallel computation. These include workloads in fields such as telecommunications, scientific computing, machine learning, financial services and data analytics. Such hybrid systems comprise a high performance environment.
In order to extract the best performance, optimizations related to CPU isolation, memory and device locality are required. However, in Kubernetes, these optimizations are handled by a disjoint set of components.
_Topology Manager_ is a Kubelet component that aims to co-ordinate the set of components that are responsible for these optimizations.
{{% /capture %}}
{{% capture prerequisites %}}
{{< include "task-tutorial-prereqs.md" >}} {{< version-check >}}
{{% /capture %}}
{{% capture steps %}}
## How Topology Manager Works
Prior to the introduction of Topology Manager, the CPU and Device Manager in Kubernetes make resource allocation decisions independently of each other.
This can result in undesirable allocations on multiple-socketed systems, performance/latency sensitive applications will suffer due to these undesirable allocations.
Undesirable in this case meaning for example, CPUs and devices being allocated from different NUMA Nodes thus, incurring additional latency.
The Topology Manager is a Kubelet component, which acts as a source of truth so that other Kubelet components can make topology aligned resource allocation choices.
The Topology Manager provides an interface for components, called *Hint Providers*, to send and receive topology information. Topology Manager has a set of node level policies which are explained below.
The Topology manager receives Topology information from the *Hint Providers* as a bitmask denoting NUMA Nodes available and a preferred allocation indication. The Topology Manager policies perform a set of operations on the hints provided and converge on the hint determined by the policy to give the optimal result, if an undesirable hint is stored the preferred field for the hint will be set to false. In the current policies preferred is the narrowest preferred mask.
The selected hint is stored as part of the Topology Manager. Depending on the policy configured the pod can be accepted or rejected from the node based on the selected hint.
The hint is then stored in the Topology Manager for use by the *Hint Providers* when making the resource allocation decisions.
### Enable the Topology Manager feature
Support for the Topology Manager requires `TopologyManager` [feature gate](/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/feature-gates/) to be enabled. It is enabled by default starting with Kubernetes 1.18.
### Topology Manager Policies
The Topology Manager currently:
- Works on Nodes with the `static` CPU Manager Policy enabled. See [control CPU Management Policies](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/cpu-management-policies/)
- Works on Pods making CPU requests or Device requests via extended resources
If these conditions are met, Topology Manager will align the requested resources.
Topology Manager supports four allocation policies. You can set a policy via a Kubelet flag, `--topology-manager-policy`.
There are four supported policies:
* `none` (default)
* `best-effort`
* `restricted`
* `single-numa-node`
### none policy {#policy-none}
This is the default policy and does not perform any topology alignment.
### best-effort policy {#policy-best-effort}
For each container in a Guaranteed Pod, kubelet, with `best-effort` topology
management policy, calls each Hint Provider to discover their resource availability.
Using this information, the Topology Manager stores the
preferred NUMA Node affinity for that container. If the affinity is not preferred,
Topology Manager will store this and admit the pod to the node anyway.
The *Hint Providers* can then use this information when making the
resource allocation decision.
### restricted policy {#policy-restricted}
For each container in a Guaranteed Pod, kubelet, with `restricted` topology
management policy, calls each Hint Provider to discover their resource availability.
Using this information, the Topology Manager stores the
preferred NUMA Node affinity for that container. If the affinity is not preferred,
Topology Manager will reject this pod from the node. This will result in a pod in a `Terminated` state with a pod admission failure.
Once the pod is in a `Terminated` state, the Kubernetes scheduler will **not** attempt to reschedule the pod. It is recommended to use a ReplicaSet or Deployment to trigger a redeploy of the pod.
An external control loop could be also implemented to trigger a redeployment of pods that have the `Topology Affinity` error.
If the pod is admitted, the *Hint Providers* can then use this information when making the
resource allocation decision.
### single-numa-node policy {#policy-single-numa-node}
For each container in a Guaranteed Pod, kubelet, with `single-numa-node` topology
management policy, calls each Hint Provider to discover their resource availability.
Using this information, the Topology Manager determines if a single NUMA Node affinity is possible.
If it is, Topology Manager will store this and the *Hint Providers* can then use this information when making the
resource allocation decision.
If, however, this is not possible then the Topology Manager will reject the pod from the node. This will result in a pod in a `Terminated` state with a pod admission failure.
Once the pod is in a `Terminated` state, the Kubernetes scheduler will **not** attempt to reschedule the pod. It is recommended to use a Deployment with replicas to trigger a redeploy of the Pod.
An external control loop could be also implemented to trigger a redeployment of pods that have the `Topology Affinity` error.
### Pod Interactions with Topology Manager Policies
Consider the containers in the following pod specs:
```yaml
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx
```
This pod runs in the `BestEffort` QoS class because no resource `requests` or
`limits` are specified.
```yaml
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx
resources:
limits:
memory: "200Mi"
requests:
memory: "100Mi"
```
This pod runs in the `Burstable` QoS class because requests are less than limits.
If the selected policy is anything other than `none` , Topology Manager would not consider either of these Pod
specifications.
```yaml
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx
resources:
limits:
memory: "200Mi"
cpu: "2"
example.com/device: "1"
requests:
memory: "200Mi"
cpu: "2"
example.com/device: "1"
```
This pod runs in the `Guaranteed` QoS class because `requests` are equal to `limits`.
```yaml
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx
resources:
limits:
example.com/deviceA: "1"
example.com/deviceB: "1"
requests:
example.com/deviceA: "1"
example.com/deviceB: "1"
```
This pod runs in the `BestEffort` QoS class because there are no CPU and memory requests.
The Topology Manager would consider both of the above pods. The Topology Manager would consult the Hint Providers, which are CPU and Device Manager to get topology hints for the pods.
In the case of the `Guaranteed` pod the `static` CPU Manager policy would return hints relating to the CPU request and the Device Manager would send back hints for the requested device.
In the case of the `BestEffort` pod the CPU Manager would send back the default hint as there is no CPU request and the Device Manager would send back the hints for each of the requested devices.
Using this information the Topology Manager calculates the optimal hint for the pod and stores this information, which will be used by the Hint Providers when they are making their resource assignments.
### Known Limitations
1. The maximum number of NUMA nodes that Topology Manager allows is 8. With more than 8 NUMA nodes there will be a state explosion when trying to enumerate the possible NUMA affinities and generating their hints.
2. The scheduler is not topology-aware, so it is possible to be scheduled on a node and then fail on the node due to the Topology Manager.
3. The Device Manager and the CPU Manager are the only components to adopt the Topology Manager's HintProvider interface. This means that NUMA alignment can only be achieved for resources managed by the CPU Manager and the Device Manager. Memory or Hugepages are not considered by the Topology Manager for NUMA alignment.
{{% /capture %}}