gix missed identation caused by lint

This commit is contained in:
Tsahi Duek
2020-04-10 14:43:45 +03:00
parent ba7708fa7a
commit 893aeecddd
@@ -168,21 +168,21 @@ There are some implicit conventions worth noting here:
- If the incoming Pod has `spec.nodeSelector` or `spec.affinity.nodeAffinity` defined, nodes not matching them will be bypassed.
Suppose you have a 5-node cluster ranging from zoneA to zoneC:
Suppose you have a 5-node cluster ranging from zoneA to zoneC:
```
+---------------+---------------+-------+
| zoneA | zoneB | zoneC |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| node1 | node2 | node3 | node4 | node5 |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| P | P | P | | |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
```
```
+---------------+---------------+-------+
| zoneA | zoneB | zoneC |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| node1 | node2 | node3 | node4 | node5 |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| P | P | P | | |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
```
and you know that "zoneC" must be excluded. In this case, you can compose the yaml as below, so that "mypod" will be placed onto "zoneB" instead of "zoneC". Similarly `spec.nodeSelector` is also respected.
and you know that "zoneC" must be excluded. In this case, you can compose the yaml as below, so that "mypod" will be placed onto "zoneB" instead of "zoneC". Similarly `spec.nodeSelector` is also respected.
{{< codenew file="pods/topology-spread-constraints/one-constraint-with-nodeaffinity.yaml" >}}
{{< codenew file="pods/topology-spread-constraints/one-constraint-with-nodeaffinity.yaml" >}}
### Cluster-level default constraints