whentimeslows/website
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #31850 from marosset/move-windows-resource-management-1.24

Browse Source 
Moving windows resource management to separate page
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Prow Robot
2022-03-24 22:39:50 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent b2f72a383e f217a5415e
commit 81aee215f7
2 changed files with 84 additions and 71 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
content/en/docs/concepts/configuration/windows-resource-management.md
+83
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
---
reviewers:
- jayunit100
- jsturtevant
- marosset
- perithompson
title: Resource Management for Windows nodes
content_type: concept
weight: 75
---
<!-- overview -->
This page outlines the differences in how resources are managed between Linux and Windows.
<!-- body -->
On Linux nodes, {{< glossary_tooltip text="cgroups" term_id="cgroup" >}} are used
as a pod boundary for resource control. Containers are created within that boundary
for network, process and file system isolation. The Linux cgroup APIs can be used to
gather CPU, I/O, and memory use statistics.
In contrast, Windows uses a [_job object_](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/win32/procthread/job-objects) per container with a system namespace filter
to contain all processes in a container and provide logical isolation from the
host.
(Job objects are a Windows process isolation mechanism and are different from
what Kubernetes refers to as a {{< glossary_tooltip term_id="job" text="Job" >}}).
There is no way to run a Windows container without the namespace filtering in
place. This means that system privileges cannot be asserted in the context of the
host, and thus privileged containers are not available on Windows.
Containers cannot assume an identity from the host because the Security Account Manager
(SAM) is separate.
## Memory reservations {#resource-management-memory}
Windows does not have an out-of-memory process killer as Linux does. Windows always
treats all user-mode memory allocations as virtual, and pagefiles are mandatory.
Windows nodes do not overcommit memory for processes running in containers. The
net effect is that Windows won't reach out of memory conditions the same way Linux
does, and processes page to disk instead of being subject to out of memory (OOM)
termination. If memory is over-provisioned and all physical memory is exhausted,
then paging can slow down performance.
You can place bounds on memory use for workloads using the kubelet
parameters `--kubelet-reserve` and/or `--system-reserve`; these account
for memory usage on the node (outside of containers), and reduce
[NodeAllocatable](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/reserve-compute-resources/#node-allocatable).
As you deploy workloads, set resource limits on containers. This also subtracts from
`NodeAllocatable` and prevents the scheduler from adding more pods once a node is full.
{{< note >}}
When you set memory resource limits for Windows containers, you should either set a
limit and leave the memory request unspecified, or set the request equal to the limit.
{{< /note >}}
On Windows, good practice to avoid over-provisioning is to configure the kubelet
with a system reserved memory of at least 2GiB to account for Windows, Kubernetes
and container runtime overheads.
## CPU reservations {#resource-management-cpu}
To account for CPU use by the operating system, the container runtime, and by
Kubernetes host processes such as the kubelet, you can (and should) reserve a
percentage of total CPU. You should determine this CPU reservation taking account of
to the number of CPU cores available on the node. To decide on the CPU percentage to
reserve, identify the maximum pod density for each node and monitor the CPU usage of
the system services running there, then choose a value that meets your workload needs.
You can place bounds on CPU usage for workloads using the
kubelet parameters `--kubelet-reserve` and/or `--system-reserve` to
account for CPU usage on the node (outside of containers).
This reduces `NodeAllocatable`.
The cluster-wide scheduler then takes this reservation into account when determining
pod placement.
On Windows, the kubelet supports a command-line flag to set the priority of the
kubelet process: `--windows-priorityclass`. This flag allows the kubelet process to get
more CPU time slices when compared to other processes running on the Windows host.
More information on the allowable values and their meaning is available at
[Windows Priority Classes](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/procthread/scheduling-priorities#priority-class).
To ensure that running Pods do not starve the kubelet of CPU cycles, set this flag to `ABOVE_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS` or above.
content/en/docs/setup/production-environment/windows/intro-windows-in-kubernetes.md
+1 -71
View File
@@ -42,76 +42,6 @@ This document uses the term *Windows containers* to mean Windows containers with
process isolation. Kubernetes does not support running Windows containers with
[Hyper-V isolation](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/windowscontainers/manage-containers/hyperv-container).
## Resource management
On Linux nodes, {{< glossary_tooltip text="cgroups" term_id="cgroup" >}} are used
as a pod boundary for resource control. Containers are created within that boundary
for network, process and file system isolation. The Linux cgroup APIs can be used
to gather CPU, I/O, and memory use statistics.
In contrast, Windows uses a _job object_ per container with a system namespace filter
to contain all processes in a container and provide logical isolation from the
host.
(Job objects are a Windows process isolation mechanism and are different from
what Kubernetes refers to as a {{< glossary_tooltip term_id="job" text="Job" >}}).
There is no way to run a Windows container without the namespace filtering in
place. This means that system privileges cannot be asserted in the context of the
host, and thus privileged containers are not available on Windows.
Containers cannot assume an identity from the host because the Security Account Manager
(SAM) is separate.
#### Memory reservations {#resource-management-memory}
Windows does not have an out-of-memory process killer as Linux does. Windows always
treats all user-mode memory allocations as virtual, and pagefiles are mandatory
(on Linux, the kubelet will by default not start with swap space enabled).
Windows nodes do not overcommit memory for processes running in containers. The
net effect is that Windows won't reach out of memory conditions the same way Linux
does, and processes page to disk instead of being subject to out of memory (OOM)
termination. If memory is over-provisioned and all physical memory is exhausted,
then paging can slow down performance.
You can place bounds on memory use for workloads using the kubelet
parameters `--kubelet-reserve` and/or `--system-reserve`; these account
for memory usage on the node (outside of containers), and reduce
[NodeAllocatable](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/reserve-compute-resources/#node-allocatable).
As you deploy workloads, set resource limits on containers. This also subtracts from
`NodeAllocatable` and prevents the scheduler from adding more pods once a node is full.
{{< note >}}
When you set memory resource limits for Windows containers, you should either set a
limit and leave the memory request unspecified, or set the request equal to the limit.
{{< /note >}}
On Windows, good practice to avoid over-provisioning is to configure the kubelet
with a system reserved memory of at least 2GiB to account for Windows, Kubernetes
and container runtime overheads.
#### CPU reservations {#resource-management-cpu}
To account for CPU use by the operating system, the container runtime, and by
Kubernetes host processes such as the kubelet, you can (and should) reserve a
percentage of total CPU. You should determine this CPU reservation taking account of
to the number of CPU cores available on the node. To decide on the CPU percentage to
reserve, identify the maximum pod density for each node and monitor the CPU usage of
the system services running there, then choose a value that meets your workload needs.
You can place bounds on CPU usage for workloads using the
kubelet parameters `--kubelet-reserve` and/or `--system-reserve` to
account for CPU usage on the node (outside of containers).
This reduces `NodeAllocatable`.
The cluster-wide scheduler then takes this reservation into account when determining
pod placement.
On Windows, the kubelet supports a command-line flag to set the priority of the
kubelet process: `--windows-priorityclass`. This flag allows the kubelet process to get
more CPU time slices when compared to other processes running on the Windows host.
More information on the allowable values and their meaning is available at
[Windows Priority Classes](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/procthread/scheduling-priorities#priority-class).
To ensure that running Pods do not starve the kubelet of CPU cycles, set this flag to `ABOVE_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS` or above.
## Compatibility and limitations {#limitations}
Some node features are only available if you use a specific
@@ -490,7 +420,7 @@ For more details, refer to the deployment guide of the CSI plugin you wish to de
The behavior of some kubelet command line options behave differently on Windows, as described below:
* The `--windows-priorityclass` lets you set the scheduling priority of the kubelet process (see [CPU resource management](#resource-management-cpu))
* The `--windows-priorityclass` lets you set the scheduling priority of the kubelet process (see [CPU resource management](/docs/concepts/configuration/windows-resource-management/#resource-management-cpu))
* The `--kubelet-reserve`, `--system-reserve` , and `--eviction-hard` flags update [NodeAllocatable](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/reserve-compute-resources/#node-allocatable)
* Eviction by using `--enforce-node-allocable` is not implemented
* Eviction by using `--eviction-hard` and `--eviction-soft` are not implemented