Merge pull request #29018 from SamWheating/sw-fix-sentence-in-hpa-docs
Fixing improper sentence in HPA documentation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -198,14 +198,17 @@ The detailed documentation of `kubectl autoscale` can be found [here](/docs/refe
|
||||
|
||||
## Autoscaling during rolling update
|
||||
|
||||
Currently in Kubernetes, it is possible to perform a rolling update by using the deployment object, which manages the underlying replica sets for you.
|
||||
Horizontal Pod Autoscaler only supports the latter approach: the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler is bound to the deployment object,
|
||||
it sets the size for the deployment object, and the deployment is responsible for setting sizes of underlying replica sets.
|
||||
Kubernetes lets you perform a rolling update on a Deployment. In that
|
||||
case, the Deployment manages the underlying ReplicaSets for you.
|
||||
When you configure autoscaling for a Deployment, you bind a
|
||||
HorizontalPodAutoscaler to a single Deployment. The HorizontalPodAutoscaler
|
||||
manages the `replicas` field of the Deployment. The deployment controller is responsible
|
||||
for setting the `replicas` of the underlying ReplicaSets so that they add up to a suitable
|
||||
number during the rollout and also afterwards.
|
||||
|
||||
Horizontal Pod Autoscaler does not work with rolling update using direct manipulation of replication controllers,
|
||||
i.e. you cannot bind a Horizontal Pod Autoscaler to a replication controller and do rolling update.
|
||||
The reason this doesn't work is that when rolling update creates a new replication controller,
|
||||
the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler will not be bound to the new replication controller.
|
||||
If you perform a rolling update of a StatefulSet that has an autoscaled number of
|
||||
replicas, the StatefulSet directly manages its set of Pods (there is no intermediate resource
|
||||
similar to ReplicaSet).
|
||||
|
||||
## Support for cooldown/delay
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user