Move Compute Resources topic to Concepts. (#2410)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ toc:
|
||||
- title: Configuration
|
||||
section:
|
||||
- docs/concepts/configuration/container-command-args.md
|
||||
- docs/concepts/configuration/manage-compute-resources-container.md
|
||||
|
||||
- title: Policies
|
||||
section:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,430 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Managing Compute Resources for Containers
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{% capture overview %}
|
||||
|
||||
When you specify a [Pod](/docs/user-guide/pods), you can optionally specify how
|
||||
much CPU and memory (RAM) each Container needs. When Containers have resource
|
||||
requests specified, the scheduler can make better decisions about which nodes to
|
||||
place Pods on. And when Containers have their limits specified, contention for
|
||||
resources on a node can be handled in a specified manner. For more details about
|
||||
the difference between requests and limits, see
|
||||
[Resource QoS](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/resource-qos.md).
|
||||
|
||||
{% endcapture %}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
{% capture body %}
|
||||
|
||||
## Resource types
|
||||
|
||||
*CPU* and *memory* are each a *resource type*. A resource type has a base unit.
|
||||
CPU is specified in units of cores, and memory is specified in units of bytes.
|
||||
|
||||
CPU and memory are collectively referred to as *compute resources*, or just
|
||||
*resources*. Compute
|
||||
resources are measurable quantities that can be requested, allocated, and
|
||||
consumed. They are distinct from
|
||||
[API resources](/docs/api/). API resources, such as Pods and
|
||||
[Services](/docs/user-guide/services) are objects that can be read and modified
|
||||
through the Kubernetes API server.
|
||||
|
||||
## Resource requests and limits of Pod and Container
|
||||
|
||||
Each Container of a Pod can specify one or more of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
* `spec.containers[].resources.limits.cpu`
|
||||
* `spec.containers[].resources.limits.memory`
|
||||
* `spec.containers[].resources.requests.cpu`
|
||||
* `spec.containers[].resources.requests.memory`
|
||||
|
||||
Although requests and limits can only be specified on individual Containers, it
|
||||
is convenient to talk about Pod resource requests and limits. A
|
||||
*Pod resource request/limit* for a particular resource type is the sum of the
|
||||
resource requests/limits of that type for each Container in the Pod.
|
||||
|
||||
## Meaning of CPU
|
||||
|
||||
Limits and requests for CPU resources are measured in *cpu* units.
|
||||
One cpu, in Kubernetes, is equivalent to:
|
||||
|
||||
- 1 AWS vCPU
|
||||
- 1 GCP Core
|
||||
- 1 Azure vCore
|
||||
- 1 *Hyperthread* on a bare-metal Intel processor with Hyperthreading
|
||||
|
||||
Fractional requests are allowed. A Container with
|
||||
`spec.containers[].resources.requests.cpu` of `0.5` is guaranteed half as much
|
||||
CPU as one that asks for 1 CPU. The expression `0.1` is equivalent to the
|
||||
expression `100m`, which can be read as "one hundred millicpu". Some people say
|
||||
"one hundred millicores", and this is understood to mean the same thing. A
|
||||
request with a decimal point, like `0.1`, is converted to `100m` by the API, and
|
||||
precision finer than `1m` is not allowed. For this reason, the form `100m` might
|
||||
be preferred.
|
||||
|
||||
CPU is always requested as an absolute quantity, never as a relative quantity;
|
||||
0.1 is the same amount of CPU on a single-core, dual-core, or 48-core machine.
|
||||
|
||||
## Meaning of memory
|
||||
|
||||
Limits and requests for `memory` are measured in bytes. You can express memory as
|
||||
a plain integer or as a fixed-point integer using one of these SI suffixes:
|
||||
E, P, T, G, M, K. You can also use the power-of-two equivalents: Ei, Pi, Ti, Gi,
|
||||
Mi, Ki. For example, the following represent roughly the same value:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
128974848, 129e6, 129M, 123Mi
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Here's an example.
|
||||
The following Pod has two Containers. Each Container has a request of 0.25 cpu
|
||||
and 64MiB (2<sup>26</sup> bytes) of memory Each Container has a limit of 0.5
|
||||
cpu and 128MiB of memory. You can say the Pod has a request of 0.5 cpu and 128
|
||||
MiB of memory, and a limit of 1 core and 256MiB of memory.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: frontend
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: db
|
||||
image: mysql
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
memory: "64Mi"
|
||||
cpu: "250m"
|
||||
limits:
|
||||
memory: "128Mi"
|
||||
cpu: "500m"
|
||||
- name: wp
|
||||
image: wordpress
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
memory: "64Mi"
|
||||
cpu: "250m"
|
||||
limits:
|
||||
memory: "128Mi"
|
||||
cpu: "500m"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## How Pods with resource requests are scheduled
|
||||
|
||||
When you create a Pod, the Kubernetes scheduler selects a node for the Pod to
|
||||
run on. Each node has a maximum capacity for each of the resource types: the
|
||||
amount of CPU and memory it can provide for Pods. The scheduler ensures that,
|
||||
for each resource type, the sum of the resource requests of the scheduled
|
||||
Containers is less than the capacity of the node. Note that although actual memory
|
||||
or CPU resource usage on nodes is very low, the scheduler still refuses to place
|
||||
a Pod on a node if the capacity check fails. This protects against a resource
|
||||
shortage on a node when resource usage later increases, for example, during a
|
||||
daily peak in request rate.
|
||||
|
||||
## How Pods with resource limits are run
|
||||
|
||||
When the kubelet starts a Container of a Pod, it passes the CPU and memory limits
|
||||
to the container runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
When using Docker:
|
||||
|
||||
- The `spec.containers[].resources.requests.cpu` is converted to its core value,
|
||||
which is potentially fractional, and multiplied by 1024. This number is used
|
||||
as the value of the
|
||||
[`--cpu-shares`](https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/run/#/cpu-share-constraint)
|
||||
flag in the `docker run` command.
|
||||
|
||||
- The `spec.containers[].resources.limits.cpu` is converted to its millicore value,
|
||||
multiplied by 100000, and then divided by 1000. This number is used as the value
|
||||
of the [`--cpu-quota`](https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/run/#/cpu-quota-constraint)
|
||||
flag in the `docker run` command. he [`--cpu-period`] flag is set to 100000,
|
||||
which represents the default 100ms period for measuring quota usage. The
|
||||
kubelet enforces cpu limits if it is started with the
|
||||
[`--cpu-cfs-quota`] flag set to true. As of Kubernetes version 1.2, this flag
|
||||
defaults to true.
|
||||
|
||||
- The `spec.containers[].resources.limits.memory` is converted to an integer, and
|
||||
used as the value of the
|
||||
[`--memory`](https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/run/#/user-memory-constraints)
|
||||
flag in the `docker run` command.
|
||||
|
||||
If a Container exceeds its memory limit, it might be terminated. If it is
|
||||
restartable, the kubelet will restart it, as with any other type of runtime
|
||||
failure.
|
||||
|
||||
If a Container exceeds its memory request, it is likely that its Pod will
|
||||
be evicted whenever the node runs out of memory.
|
||||
|
||||
A Container might or might not be allowed to exceed its CPU limit for extended
|
||||
periods of time. However, it will not be killed for excessive CPU usage.
|
||||
|
||||
To determine whether a Container cannot be scheduled or is being killed due to
|
||||
resource limits, see the
|
||||
[Troubleshooting](#troubleshooting) section.
|
||||
|
||||
## Monitoring compute resource usage
|
||||
|
||||
The resource usage of a Pod is reported as part of the Pod status.
|
||||
|
||||
If [optional monitoring](http://releases.k8s.io/{{page.githubbranch}}/cluster/addons/cluster-monitoring/README.md)
|
||||
is configured for your cluster, then Pod resource usage can be retrieved from
|
||||
the monitoring system.
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
### My Pods are pending with event message failedScheduling
|
||||
|
||||
If the scheduler cannot find any node where a Pod can fit, the Pod remains
|
||||
unscheduled until a place can be found. An event is produced each time the
|
||||
scheduler fails to find a place for the Pod, like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
$ kubectl describe pod frontend | grep -A 3 Events
|
||||
Events:
|
||||
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From Subobject PathReason Message
|
||||
36s 5s 6 {scheduler } FailedScheduling Failed for reason PodExceedsFreeCPU and possibly others
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
In the preceding example, the Pod named "frontend" fails to be scheduled due to
|
||||
insufficient CPU resource on the node. Similar error messages can also suggest
|
||||
failure due to insufficient memory (PodExceedsFreeMemory). In general, if a Pod
|
||||
is pending with a message of this type, there are several things to try:
|
||||
|
||||
- Add more nodes to the cluster.
|
||||
- Terminate unneeded Pods to make room for pending Pods.
|
||||
- Check that the Pod is not larger than all the nodes. For example, if all the
|
||||
nodes have a capacity of `cpu: 1`, then a Pod with a limit of `cpu: 1.1` will
|
||||
never be scheduled.
|
||||
|
||||
You can check node capacities and amounts allocated with the
|
||||
`kubectl describe nodes` command. For example:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
$ kubectl.sh describe nodes e2e-test-minion-group-4lw4
|
||||
Name: e2e-test-minion-group-4lw4
|
||||
[ ... lines removed for clarity ...]
|
||||
Capacity:
|
||||
alpha.kubernetes.io/nvidia-gpu: 0
|
||||
cpu: 2
|
||||
memory: 7679792Ki
|
||||
pods: 110
|
||||
Allocatable:
|
||||
alpha.kubernetes.io/nvidia-gpu: 0
|
||||
cpu: 1800m
|
||||
memory: 7474992Ki
|
||||
pods: 110
|
||||
[ ... lines removed for clarity ...]
|
||||
Non-terminated Pods: (5 in total)
|
||||
Namespace Name CPU Requests CPU Limits Memory Requests Memory Limits
|
||||
--------- ---- ------------ ---------- --------------- -------------
|
||||
kube-system fluentd-gcp-v1.38-28bv1 100m (5%) 0 (0%) 200Mi (2%) 200Mi (2%)
|
||||
kube-system kube-dns-3297075139-61lj3 260m (13%) 0 (0%) 100Mi (1%) 170Mi (2%)
|
||||
kube-system kube-proxy-e2e-test-... 100m (5%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
|
||||
kube-system monitoring-influxdb-grafana-v4-z1m12 200m (10%) 200m (10%) 600Mi (8%) 600Mi (8%)
|
||||
kube-system node-problem-detector-v0.1-fj7m3 20m (1%) 200m (10%) 20Mi (0%) 100Mi (1%)
|
||||
Allocated resources:
|
||||
(Total limits may be over 100 percent, i.e., overcommitted.)
|
||||
CPU Requests CPU Limits Memory Requests Memory Limits
|
||||
------------ ---------- --------------- -------------
|
||||
680m (34%) 400m (20%) 920Mi (12%) 1070Mi (14%)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
In the preceding output, you can see that if a Pod requests more than 1120m
|
||||
CPUs or 6.23Gi of memory, it will not fit on the node.
|
||||
|
||||
By looking at the `Pods` section, you can see which Pods are taking up space on
|
||||
the node.
|
||||
|
||||
The amount of resources available to Pods is less than the node capacity, because
|
||||
system daemons use a portion of the available resources. The `allocatable` field
|
||||
[NodeStatus](/docs/resources-reference/v1.5/#nodestatus-v1)
|
||||
gives the amount of resources that are available to Pods. For more information, see
|
||||
[Node Allocatable Resources](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/node-allocatable.md).
|
||||
|
||||
The [resource quota](/docs/admin/resourcequota/) feature can be configured
|
||||
to limit the total amount of resources that can be consumed. If used in conjunction
|
||||
with namespaces, it can prevent one team from hogging all the resources.
|
||||
|
||||
### My Container is terminated
|
||||
|
||||
Your Container might get terminated because it is resource-starved. To check
|
||||
whether a Container is being killed because it is hitting a resource limit, call
|
||||
`kubectl describe pod` on the Pod of interest:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
[12:54:41] $ ./cluster/kubectl.sh describe pod simmemleak-hra99
|
||||
Name: simmemleak-hra99
|
||||
Namespace: default
|
||||
Image(s): saadali/simmemleak
|
||||
Node: kubernetes-node-tf0f/10.240.216.66
|
||||
Labels: name=simmemleak
|
||||
Status: Running
|
||||
Reason:
|
||||
Message:
|
||||
IP: 10.244.2.75
|
||||
Replication Controllers: simmemleak (1/1 replicas created)
|
||||
Containers:
|
||||
simmemleak:
|
||||
Image: saadali/simmemleak
|
||||
Limits:
|
||||
cpu: 100m
|
||||
memory: 50Mi
|
||||
State: Running
|
||||
Started: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:41 -0700
|
||||
Last Termination State: Terminated
|
||||
Exit Code: 1
|
||||
Started: Fri, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:30 -0700
|
||||
Finished: Fri, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:33 -0700
|
||||
Ready: False
|
||||
Restart Count: 5
|
||||
Conditions:
|
||||
Type Status
|
||||
Ready False
|
||||
Events:
|
||||
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Reason Message
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {scheduler } scheduled Successfully assigned simmemleak-hra99 to kubernetes-node-tf0f
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD pulled Pod container image "gcr.io/google_containers/pause:0.8.0" already present on machine
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD created Created with docker id 6a41280f516d
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD started Started with docker id 6a41280f516d
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} spec.containers{simmemleak} created Created with docker id 87348f12526a
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
In the preceding example, the `Restart Count: 5` indicates that the `simmemleak`
|
||||
Container in the Pod was terminated and restarted five times.
|
||||
|
||||
You can call `get pod` with the `-o go-template=...` option to fetch the status
|
||||
of previously terminated Containers:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell{% raw %}
|
||||
[13:59:01] $ ./cluster/kubectl.sh get pod -o go-template='{{range.status.containerStatuses}}{{"Container Name: "}}{{.name}}{{"\r\nLastState: "}}{{.lastState}}{{end}}' simmemleak-60xbc
|
||||
Container Name: simmemleak
|
||||
LastState: map[terminated:map[exitCode:137 reason:OOM Killed startedAt:2015-07-07T20:58:43Z finishedAt:2015-07-07T20:58:43Z containerID:docker://0e4095bba1feccdfe7ef9fb6ebffe972b4b14285d5acdec6f0d3ae8a22fad8b2]]{% endraw %}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
You can see that the Container was terminated because of `reason:OOM Killed`,
|
||||
where `OOM` stands for Out Of Memory.
|
||||
|
||||
## Opaque integer resources (Alpha feature)
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes version 1.5 introduces Opaque integer resources. Opaque
|
||||
integer resources allow cluster operators to advertise new node-level
|
||||
resources that would be otherwise unknown to the system.
|
||||
|
||||
Users can consume these resources in Pod specs just like CPU and memory.
|
||||
The scheduler takes care of the resource accounting so that no more than the
|
||||
available amount is simultaneously allocated to Pods.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** Opaque integer resources are Alpha in Kubernetes version 1.5.
|
||||
Only resource accounting is implemented; node-level isolation is still
|
||||
under active development.
|
||||
|
||||
Opaque integer resources are resources that begin with the prefix
|
||||
`pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/opaque-int-resource-`. The API server
|
||||
restricts quantities of these resources to whole numbers. Examples of
|
||||
_valid_ quantities are `3`, `3000m` and `3Ki`. Examples of _invalid_
|
||||
quantities are `0.5` and `1500m`.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two steps required to use opaque integer resources. First, the
|
||||
cluster operator must advertise a per-node opaque resource on one or more
|
||||
nodes. Second, users must request the opaque resource in Pods.
|
||||
|
||||
To advertise a new opaque integer resource, the cluster operator should
|
||||
submit a `PATCH` HTTP request to the API server to specify the available
|
||||
quantity in the `status.capacity` for a node in the cluster. After this
|
||||
operation, the node's `status.capacity` will include a new resource. The
|
||||
`status.allocatable` field is updated automatically with the new resource
|
||||
asynchronously by the kubelet. Note that because the scheduler uses the
|
||||
node `status.allocatable` value when evaluating Pod fitness, there may
|
||||
be a short delay between patching the node capacity with a new resource and the
|
||||
first pod that requests the resource to be scheduled on that node.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
Here is an HTTP request that advertises five "foo" resources on node `k8s-node-1`.
|
||||
|
||||
```http
|
||||
PATCH /api/v1/nodes/k8s-node-1/status HTTP/1.1
|
||||
Accept: application/json
|
||||
Content-Type: application/json-patch+json
|
||||
Host: k8s-master:8080
|
||||
|
||||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"op": "add",
|
||||
"path": "/status/capacity/pod.alpha.kubernetes.io~1opaque-int-resource-foo",
|
||||
"value": "5"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: In the preceding request, `~1` is the encoding for the character `/`
|
||||
in the patch path. The operation path value in JSON-Patch is interpreted as a
|
||||
JSON-Pointer. For more details, see
|
||||
[IETF RFC 6901, section 3](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6901#section-3).
|
||||
|
||||
To consume an opaque resource in a Pod, include the name of the opaque
|
||||
resource as a key in the `spec.containers[].resources.requests` map.
|
||||
|
||||
The Pod is scheduled only if all of the resource requests are
|
||||
satisfied, including cpu, memory and any opaque resources. The Pod will
|
||||
remain in the `PENDING` state as long as the resource request cannot be met by
|
||||
any node.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
The Pod below requests 2 cpus and 1 "foo" (an opaque resource.)
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: my-pod
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: my-container
|
||||
image: myimage
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
cpu: 2
|
||||
pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/opaque-int-resource-foo: 1
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Planned Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes version 1.5 only allows resource quantities to be specified on a
|
||||
Container. It is planned to improve accounting for resources that are shared by
|
||||
all Containers in a Pod, such as
|
||||
[emptyDir volumes](/docs/user-guide/volumes/#emptydir).
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes version 1.5 only supports Container requests and limits for CPU and
|
||||
memory. It is planned to add new resource types, including a node disk space
|
||||
resource, and a framework for adding custom
|
||||
[resource types](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/{{page.githubbranch}}/contributors/design-proposals/resources.md).
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes supports overcommitment of resources by supporting multiple levels of
|
||||
[Quality of Service](http://issue.k8s.io/168).
|
||||
|
||||
In Kubernetes version 1.5, one unit of CPU means different things on different
|
||||
cloud providers, and on different machine types within the same cloud providers.
|
||||
For example, on AWS, the capacity of a node is reported in
|
||||
[ECUs](http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/faqs/), while in GCE it is reported in logical
|
||||
cores. We plan to revise the definition of the cpu resource to allow for more
|
||||
consistency across providers and platforms.
|
||||
|
||||
{% endcapture %}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
{% capture whatsnext %}
|
||||
|
||||
* Get hands-on experience
|
||||
[assigning CPU and RAM resources to a container](/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/assign-cpu-ram-container/).
|
||||
|
||||
* [Container](/docs/api-reference/v1/definitions/#_v1_container)
|
||||
|
||||
* [ResourceRequirements](/docs/resources-reference/v1.5/#resourcerequirements-v1)
|
||||
|
||||
{% endcapture %}
|
||||
|
||||
{% include templates/concept.md %}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,368 +5,6 @@ assignees:
|
||||
title: Managing Compute Resources
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
* TOC
|
||||
{:toc}
|
||||
{% include user-guide-content-moved.md %}
|
||||
|
||||
When specifying a [pod](/docs/user-guide/pods), you can optionally specify how much CPU and memory (RAM) each
|
||||
container needs. When containers have their resource requests specified, the scheduler is
|
||||
able to make better decisions about which nodes to place pods on; and when containers have their
|
||||
limits specified, contention for resources on a node can be handled in a specified manner. For
|
||||
more details about the difference between requests and limits, please refer to
|
||||
[Resource QoS](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/design/resource-qos.md).
|
||||
|
||||
*CPU* and *memory* are each a *resource type*. A resource type has a base unit. CPU is specified
|
||||
in units of cores. Memory is specified in units of bytes.
|
||||
|
||||
CPU and RAM are collectively referred to as *compute resources*, or just *resources*. Compute
|
||||
resources are measureable quantities which can be requested, allocated, and consumed. They are
|
||||
distinct from [API resources](/docs/user-guide/working-with-resources). API resources, such as pods and
|
||||
[services](/docs/user-guide/services) are objects that can be written to and retrieved from the Kubernetes API
|
||||
server.
|
||||
|
||||
## Resource Requests and Limits of Pod and Container
|
||||
|
||||
Each container of a pod can optionally specify one or more of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
* `spec.containers[].resources.limits.cpu`
|
||||
* `spec.containers[].resources.limits.memory`
|
||||
* `spec.containers[].resources.requests.cpu`
|
||||
* `spec.containers[].resources.requests.memory`.
|
||||
|
||||
Specifying resource requests and/or limits is optional. In some clusters, unset limits or requests
|
||||
may be replaced with default values when a pod is created or updated. The default value depends on
|
||||
how the cluster is configured. If the requests values are not specified, they are set to be equal
|
||||
to the limits values by default. Please note that limits must always be greater than or equal to
|
||||
requests.
|
||||
|
||||
Although requests/limits can only be specified on individual containers, it is convenient to talk
|
||||
about pod resource requests/limits. A *pod resource request/limit* for a particular resource
|
||||
type is the sum of the resource requests/limits of that type for each container in the pod, with
|
||||
unset values treated as zero (or equal to default values in some cluster configurations).
|
||||
|
||||
### Meaning of CPU
|
||||
Limits and requests for `cpu` are measured in cpus.
|
||||
One cpu, in Kubernetes, is equivalent to:
|
||||
|
||||
- 1 AWS vCPU
|
||||
- 1 GCP Core
|
||||
- 1 Azure vCore
|
||||
- 1 *Hyperthread* on a bare-metal Intel processor with Hyperthreading
|
||||
|
||||
Fractional requests are allowed. A container with `spec.containers[].resources.requests.cpu` of `0.5` will
|
||||
be guaranteed half as much CPU as one that asks for `1`. The expression `0.1` is equivalent to the expression
|
||||
`100m`, which can be read as "one hundred millicpu" (some may say "one hundred millicores", and this is understood
|
||||
to mean the same thing when talking about Kubernetes). A request with a decimal point, like `0.1` is converted to
|
||||
`100m` by the API, and precision finer than `1m` is not allowed. For this reason, the form `100m` may be preferred.
|
||||
|
||||
CPU is always requested as an absolute quantity, never as a relative quantity; 0.1 is the same amount of cpu on a single
|
||||
core, dual core, or 48 core machine.
|
||||
|
||||
# Meaning of Memory
|
||||
|
||||
Limits and requests for `memory` are measured in bytes.
|
||||
Memory can be expressed a plain integer or as fixed-point integers with one of these SI suffixes (E, P, T, G, M, K)
|
||||
or their power-of-two equivalents (Ei, Pi, Ti, Gi, Mi, Ki). For example, the following represent roughly the same value:
|
||||
`128974848`, `129e6`, `129M` , `123Mi`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Example
|
||||
The following pod has two containers. Each has a request of 0.25 core of cpu and 64MiB
|
||||
(2<sup>26</sup> bytes) of memory and a limit of 0.5 core of cpu and 128MiB of memory. The pod can
|
||||
be said to have a request of 0.5 core and 128 MiB of memory and a limit of 1 core and 256MiB of
|
||||
memory.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: frontend
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: db
|
||||
image: mysql
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
memory: "64Mi"
|
||||
cpu: "250m"
|
||||
limits:
|
||||
memory: "128Mi"
|
||||
cpu: "500m"
|
||||
- name: wp
|
||||
image: wordpress
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
memory: "64Mi"
|
||||
cpu: "250m"
|
||||
limits:
|
||||
memory: "128Mi"
|
||||
cpu: "500m"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## How Pods with Resource Requests are Scheduled
|
||||
|
||||
When a pod is created, the Kubernetes scheduler selects a node for the pod to
|
||||
run on. Each node has a maximum capacity for each of the resource types: the
|
||||
amount of CPU and memory it can provide for pods. The scheduler ensures that,
|
||||
for each resource type (CPU and memory), the sum of the resource requests of the
|
||||
containers scheduled to the node is less than the capacity of the node. Note
|
||||
that although actual memory or CPU resource usage on nodes is very low, the
|
||||
scheduler will still refuse to place pods onto nodes if the capacity check
|
||||
fails. This protects against a resource shortage on a node when resource usage
|
||||
later increases, such as due to a daily peak in request rate.
|
||||
|
||||
## How Pods with Resource Limits are Run
|
||||
|
||||
When kubelet starts a container of a pod, it passes the CPU and memory limits to the container
|
||||
runner (Docker or rkt).
|
||||
|
||||
When using Docker:
|
||||
|
||||
- The `spec.containers[].resources.requests.cpu` is converted to its core value (potentially fractional),
|
||||
and multiplied by 1024, and used as the value of the [`--cpu-shares`](https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/run/#/cpu-share-constraint)
|
||||
flag to the `docker run` command.
|
||||
- The `spec.containers[].resources.limits.cpu` is converted to its millicore value,
|
||||
multiplied by 100000, and then divided by 1000, and used as the value of the [`--cpu-quota`](
|
||||
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/run/#/cpu-quota-constraint) flag to the `docker run`
|
||||
command. The [`--cpu-period`] flag is set to 100000 which represents the default 100ms period
|
||||
for measuring quota usage. The kubelet enforces cpu limits if it was started with the
|
||||
[`--cpu-cfs-quota`] flag set to true. As of version 1.2, this flag will now default to true.
|
||||
- The `spec.containers[].resources.limits.memory` is converted to an integer, and used as the value
|
||||
of the [`--memory`](https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/run/#/user-memory-constraints) flag
|
||||
to the `docker run` command.
|
||||
|
||||
**TODO: document behavior for rkt**
|
||||
|
||||
If a container exceeds its memory limit, it may be terminated. If it is restartable, it will be
|
||||
restarted by kubelet, as will any other type of runtime failure.
|
||||
|
||||
A container may or may not be allowed to exceed its CPU limit for extended periods of time.
|
||||
However, it will not be killed for excessive CPU usage.
|
||||
|
||||
To determine if a container cannot be scheduled or is being killed due to resource limits, see the
|
||||
"Troubleshooting" section below.
|
||||
|
||||
## Monitoring Compute Resource Usage
|
||||
|
||||
The resource usage of a pod is reported as part of the Pod status.
|
||||
|
||||
If [optional monitoring](http://releases.k8s.io/{{page.githubbranch}}/cluster/addons/cluster-monitoring/README.md) is configured for your cluster,
|
||||
then pod resource usage can be retrieved from the monitoring system.
|
||||
|
||||
## Troubleshooting
|
||||
|
||||
### My pods are pending with event message failedScheduling
|
||||
|
||||
If the scheduler cannot find any node where a pod can fit, then the pod will remain unscheduled
|
||||
until a place can be found. An event will be produced each time the scheduler fails to find a
|
||||
place for the pod, like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
$ kubectl describe pod frontend | grep -A 3 Events
|
||||
Events:
|
||||
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From Subobject PathReason Message
|
||||
36s 5s 6 {scheduler } FailedScheduling Failed for reason PodExceedsFreeCPU and possibly others
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
In the case shown above, the pod "frontend" fails to be scheduled due to insufficient
|
||||
CPU resource on the node. Similar error messages can also suggest failure due to insufficient
|
||||
memory (PodExceedsFreeMemory). In general, if a pod or pods are pending with this message and
|
||||
alike, then there are several things to try:
|
||||
|
||||
- Add more nodes to the cluster.
|
||||
- Terminate unneeded pods to make room for pending pods.
|
||||
- Check that the pod is not larger than all the nodes. For example, if all the nodes
|
||||
have a capacity of `cpu: 1`, then a pod with a limit of `cpu: 1.1` will never be scheduled.
|
||||
|
||||
You can check node capacities and amounts allocated with the `kubectl describe nodes` command.
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
$ kubectl describe nodes gke-cluster-4-386701dd-node-ww4p
|
||||
Name: gke-cluster-4-386701dd-node-ww4p
|
||||
[ ... lines removed for clarity ...]
|
||||
Capacity:
|
||||
cpu: 1
|
||||
memory: 464Mi
|
||||
pods: 40
|
||||
Allocated resources (total requests):
|
||||
cpu: 910m
|
||||
memory: 2370Mi
|
||||
pods: 4
|
||||
[ ... lines removed for clarity ...]
|
||||
Pods: (4 in total)
|
||||
Namespace Name CPU(milliCPU) Memory(bytes)
|
||||
frontend webserver-ffj8j 500 (50% of total) 2097152000 (50% of total)
|
||||
kube-system fluentd-cloud-logging-gke-cluster-4-386701dd-node-ww4p 100 (10% of total) 209715200 (5% of total)
|
||||
kube-system kube-dns-v8-qopgw 310 (31% of total) 178257920 (4% of total)
|
||||
TotalResourceLimits:
|
||||
CPU(milliCPU): 910 (91% of total)
|
||||
Memory(bytes): 2485125120 (59% of total)
|
||||
[ ... lines removed for clarity ...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Here you can see from the `Allocated resources` section that that a pod which ask for more than
|
||||
90 millicpus or more than 1341MiB of memory will not be able to fit on this node.
|
||||
|
||||
Looking at the `Pods` section, you can see which pods are taking up space on the node.
|
||||
|
||||
The [resource quota](/docs/admin/resourcequota/) feature can be configured
|
||||
to limit the total amount of resources that can be consumed. If used in conjunction
|
||||
with namespaces, it can prevent one team from hogging all the resources.
|
||||
|
||||
### My container is terminated
|
||||
|
||||
Your container may be terminated because it's resource-starved. To check if a container is being killed because it is hitting a resource limit, call `kubectl describe pod`
|
||||
on the pod you are interested in:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
[12:54:41] $ ./cluster/kubectl.sh describe pod simmemleak-hra99
|
||||
Name: simmemleak-hra99
|
||||
Namespace: default
|
||||
Image(s): saadali/simmemleak
|
||||
Node: kubernetes-node-tf0f/10.240.216.66
|
||||
Labels: name=simmemleak
|
||||
Status: Running
|
||||
Reason:
|
||||
Message:
|
||||
IP: 10.244.2.75
|
||||
Replication Controllers: simmemleak (1/1 replicas created)
|
||||
Containers:
|
||||
simmemleak:
|
||||
Image: saadali/simmemleak
|
||||
Limits:
|
||||
cpu: 100m
|
||||
memory: 50Mi
|
||||
State: Running
|
||||
Started: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:41 -0700
|
||||
Last Termination State: Terminated
|
||||
Exit Code: 1
|
||||
Started: Fri, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:30 -0700
|
||||
Finished: Fri, 07 Jul 2015 12:54:33 -0700
|
||||
Ready: False
|
||||
Restart Count: 5
|
||||
Conditions:
|
||||
Type Status
|
||||
Ready False
|
||||
Events:
|
||||
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Reason Message
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {scheduler } scheduled Successfully assigned simmemleak-hra99 to kubernetes-node-tf0f
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD pulled Pod container image "gcr.io/google_containers/pause:0.8.0" already present on machine
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD created Created with docker id 6a41280f516d
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} implicitly required container POD started Started with docker id 6a41280f516d
|
||||
Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:53:51 -0700 1 {kubelet kubernetes-node-tf0f} spec.containers{simmemleak} created Created with docker id 87348f12526a
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The `Restart Count: 5` indicates that the `simmemleak` container in this pod was terminated and restarted 5 times.
|
||||
|
||||
You can call `get pod` with the `-o go-template=...` option to fetch the status of previously terminated containers:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell{% raw %}
|
||||
[13:59:01] $ ./cluster/kubectl.sh get pod -o go-template='{{range.status.containerStatuses}}{{"Container Name: "}}{{.name}}{{"\r\nLastState: "}}{{.lastState}}{{end}}' simmemleak-60xbc
|
||||
Container Name: simmemleak
|
||||
LastState: map[terminated:map[exitCode:137 reason:OOM Killed startedAt:2015-07-07T20:58:43Z finishedAt:2015-07-07T20:58:43Z containerID:docker://0e4095bba1feccdfe7ef9fb6ebffe972b4b14285d5acdec6f0d3ae8a22fad8b2]]{% endraw %}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
We can see that this container was terminated because `reason:OOM Killed`, where *OOM* stands for Out Of Memory.
|
||||
|
||||
## Opaque Integer Resources (Alpha Feature)
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes version 1.5 introduces Opaque integer resources. Opaque
|
||||
integer resources allow cluster operators to advertise new node-level
|
||||
resources that would be otherwise unknown to the system.
|
||||
|
||||
Users can consume these resources in pod specs just like CPU and memory.
|
||||
The scheduler takes care of the resource accounting so that no more than the
|
||||
available amount is simultaneously allocated to pods.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** Opaque integer resources are Alpha in Kubernetes version 1.5.
|
||||
Only resource accounting is implemented; node-level isolation is still
|
||||
under active development.
|
||||
|
||||
Opaque integer resources are resources that begin with the prefix
|
||||
`pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/opaque-int-resource-`. The API server
|
||||
restricts quantities of these resources to whole numbers. Examples of
|
||||
_valid_ quantities are `3`, `3000m` and `3Ki`. Examples of _invalid_
|
||||
quantities are `0.5` and `1500m`.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two steps required to use opaque integer resources. First, the
|
||||
cluster operator must advertise a per-node opaque resource on one or more
|
||||
nodes. Second, users must request the opaque resource in pods.
|
||||
|
||||
To advertise a new opaque integer resource, the cluster operator should
|
||||
submit a `PATCH` HTTP request to the API server to specify the available
|
||||
quantity in the `status.capacity` for a node in the cluster. After this
|
||||
operation, the node's `status.capacity` will include a new resource. The
|
||||
`status.allocatable` field is updated automatically with the new resource
|
||||
asychronously by the Kubelet. Note that since the scheduler uses the
|
||||
node `status.allocatable` value when evaluating pod fitness, there may
|
||||
be a short delay between patching the node capacity with a new resource and the
|
||||
first pod that requests the resource to be scheduled on that node.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
The HTTP request below advertises 5 "foo" resources on node `k8s-node-1`.
|
||||
|
||||
_NOTE: `~1` is the encoding for the character `/` in the patch path.
|
||||
The operation path value in JSON-Patch is interpreted as a JSON-Pointer.
|
||||
For more details, please refer to
|
||||
[IETF RFC 6901, section 3](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6901#section-3)._
|
||||
|
||||
```http
|
||||
PATCH /api/v1/nodes/k8s-node-1/status HTTP/1.1
|
||||
Accept: application/json
|
||||
Content-Type: application/json-patch+json
|
||||
Host: k8s-master:8080
|
||||
|
||||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"op": "add",
|
||||
"path": "/status/capacity/pod.alpha.kubernetes.io~1opaque-int-resource-foo",
|
||||
"value": "5"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
To consume opaque resources in pods, include the name of the opaque
|
||||
resource as a key in the `spec.containers[].resources.requests` map.
|
||||
|
||||
The pod will be scheduled only if all of the resource requests are
|
||||
satisfied (including cpu, memory and any opaque resources.) The pod will
|
||||
remain in the `PENDING` state while the resource request cannot be met by any
|
||||
node.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
The pod below requests 2 cpus and 1 "foo" (an opaque resource.)
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: my-pod
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: my-container
|
||||
image: myimage
|
||||
resources:
|
||||
requests:
|
||||
cpu: 2
|
||||
pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/opaque-int-resource-foo: 1
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Planned Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
The current system only allows resource quantities to be specified on a container.
|
||||
It is planned to improve accounting for resources which are shared by all containers in a pod,
|
||||
such as [EmptyDir volumes](/docs/user-guide/volumes/#emptydir).
|
||||
|
||||
The current system only supports container requests and limits for CPU and Memory.
|
||||
It is planned to add new resource types, including a node disk space
|
||||
resource, and a framework for adding custom [resource types](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/{{page.githubbranch}}/contributors/design-proposals/resources.md).
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes supports overcommitment of resources by supporting multiple levels of [Quality of Service](http://issue.k8s.io/168).
|
||||
|
||||
Currently, one unit of CPU means different things on different cloud providers, and on different
|
||||
machine types within the same cloud providers. For example, on AWS, the capacity of a node
|
||||
is reported in [ECUs](http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/faqs/), while in GCE it is reported in logical
|
||||
cores. We plan to revise the definition of the cpu resource to allow for more consistency
|
||||
across providers and platforms.
|
||||
[Managing Compute Resources for Containers](/docs/concepts/configuration/manage-compute-resources-container/)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user