Merge pull request #25462 from bl-ue/patch-3

Update grammar in Docker deprecation blog posts
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Prow Robot
2021-01-07 11:02:53 -08:00
committed by GitHub
2 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ All your existing images will still work exactly the same.
### What about private images?
Also yes. All CRI runtimes support the same pull secrets configuration used in
Yes. All CRI runtimes support the same pull secrets configuration used in
Kubernetes, either via the PodSpec or ServiceAccount.
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ usability of other container runtimes. As an example, OpenShift 4.x has been
using the [CRI-O] runtime in production since June 2019.
For other examples and references you can look at the adopters of containerd and
cri-o, two container runtimes under the Cloud Native Computing Foundation ([CNCF]).
CRI-O, two container runtimes under the Cloud Native Computing Foundation ([CNCF]).
- [containerd](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/blob/master/ADOPTERS.md)
- [CRI-O](https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/master/ADOPTERS.md)
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ provide an end-to-end standard for managing containers.
Thats a complex question and it depends on a lot of factors. If Docker is
working for you, moving to containerd should be a relatively easy swap and
has have strictly better performance and less overhead. However we encourage you
will have strictly better performance and less overhead. However, we encourage you
to explore all the options from the [CNCF landscape] in case another would be an
even better fit for your environment.
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ common things to consider when migrating are:
- Kubectl plugins that require docker CLI or the control socket
- Kubernetes tools that require direct access to Docker (e.g. kube-imagepuller)
- Configuration of functionality like `registry-mirrors` and insecure registries
- Other support scripts or daemons that expect docker to be available and are run
- Other support scripts or daemons that expect Docker to be available and are run
outside of Kubernetes (e.g. monitoring or security agents)
- GPUs or special hardware and how they integrate with your runtime and Kubernetes
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ as a container runtime after v1.20.
**You do not need to panic. Its not as dramatic as it sounds.**
tl;dr Docker as an underlying runtime is being deprecated in favor of runtimes
that use the [Container Runtime Interface(CRI)](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2016/12/container-runtime-interface-cri-in-kubernetes/)
TL;DR Docker as an underlying runtime is being deprecated in favor of runtimes
that use the [Container Runtime Interface (CRI)](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2016/12/container-runtime-interface-cri-in-kubernetes/)
created for Kubernetes. Docker-produced images will continue to work in your
cluster with all runtimes, as they always have.
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ is a popular choice for that runtime (other common options include containerd
and CRI-O), but Docker was not designed to be embedded inside Kubernetes, and
that causes a problem.
You see, the thing we call “Docker” isnt actually one thing -- its an entire
You see, the thing we call “Docker” isnt actually one thing—its an entire
tech stack, and one part of it is a thing called “containerd,” which is a
high-level container runtime by itself. Docker is cool and useful because it has
a lot of UX enhancements that make it really easy for humans to interact with
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ does Kubernetes need the Dockershim?
Docker isnt compliant with CRI, the [Container Runtime Interface](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2016/12/container-runtime-interface-cri-in-kubernetes/).
If it were, we wouldnt need the shim, and this wouldnt be a thing. But its
not the end of the world, and you dont need to panic -- you just need to change
not the end of the world, and you dont need to panic—you just need to change
your container runtime from Docker to another supported container runtime.
One thing to note: If you are relying on the underlying docker socket
(/var/run/docker.sock) as part of a workflow within your cluster today, moving
(`/var/run/docker.sock`) as part of a workflow within your cluster today, moving
to a different runtime will break your ability to use it. This pattern is often
called Docker in Docker. There are lots of options out there for this specific
use case including things like
@@ -82,10 +82,10 @@ use case including things like
This change addresses a different environment than most folks use to interact
with Docker. The Docker installation youre using in development is unrelated to
the Docker runtime inside your Kubernetes cluster. Its confusing, I know. As a
developer, Docker is still useful to you in all the ways it was before this
the Docker runtime inside your Kubernetes cluster. Its confusing, we understand.
As a developer, Docker is still useful to you in all the ways it was before this
change was announced. The image that Docker produces isnt really a
Docker-specific image -- its an OCI ([Open Container Initiative](https://opencontainers.org/)) image.
Docker-specific image—its an OCI ([Open Container Initiative](https://opencontainers.org/)) image.
Any OCI-compliant image, regardless of the tool you use to build it, will look
the same to Kubernetes. Both [containerd](https://containerd.io/) and
[CRI-O](https://cri-o.io/) know how to pull those images and run them. This is
@@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ So, this change is coming. Its going to cause issues for some, but it isnt
catastrophic, and generally its a good thing. Depending on how you interact
with Kubernetes, this could mean nothing to you, or it could mean a bit of work.
In the long run, its going to make things easier. If this is still confusing
for you, thats okay -- theres a lot going on here, Kubernetes has a lot of
for you, thats okay—theres a lot going on here; Kubernetes has a lot of
moving parts, and nobody is an expert in 100% of it. We encourage any and all
questions regardless of experience level or complexity! Our goal is to make sure
everyone is educated as much as possible on the upcoming changes. `<3` We hope
this has answered most of your questions and soothed some anxieties!
everyone is educated as much as possible on the upcoming changes. We hope
this has answered most of your questions and soothed some anxieties! ❤️
Looking for more answers? Check out our accompanying [Dockershim Deprecation FAQ](/blog/2020/12/02/dockershim-faq/).