Address comments
This commit is contained in:
+30
-22
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ CustomResourceDefinition schemas using the `x-kubernetes-validations` extension.
|
||||
The Rule is scoped to the location of the `x-kubernetes-validations` extension in the schema.
|
||||
And `self` variable in the CEL expression is bound to the scoped value.
|
||||
|
||||
Note all the validation rules are scoped to the current object, no cross-object or stateful validation rules are supported.
|
||||
All validation rules are scoped to the current object: no cross-object or stateful validation rules are supported.
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -996,18 +996,18 @@ Here is the declarations type mapping between OpenAPIv3 and CEL type:
|
||||
xref: [CEL types](https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/v0.6.0/doc/langdef.md#values), [OpenAPI
|
||||
types](https://swagger.io/specification/#data-types), [Kubernetes Structural Schemas](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/extend-kubernetes/custom-resources/custom-resource-definitions/#specifying-a-structural-schema).
|
||||
|
||||
#### Function Library
|
||||
#### Validation functions {#available-validation-functions}
|
||||
|
||||
Functions available include:
|
||||
- CEL standard functions, defined in the[list of standard definitions](https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/v0.7.0/doc/langdef.md#list-of-standard-definitions)
|
||||
- CEL standard functions, defined in the [list of standard definitions](https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/v0.7.0/doc/langdef.md#list-of-standard-definitions)
|
||||
- CEL standard [macros](https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/v0.7.0/doc/langdef.md#macros)
|
||||
- CEL [extended string function library](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/google/cel-go@v0.11.2/ext#Strings)
|
||||
- Kubernetes [CEL extension library](https://pkg.go.dev/k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver@v0.24.0-alpha.4/pkg/apiserver/schema/cel/library#pkg-functions)
|
||||
- Kubernetes [CEL extension library](https://pkg.go.dev/k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver@v0.24.0/pkg/apiserver/schema/cel/library#pkg-functions)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Transition Rules
|
||||
#### Transition rules
|
||||
|
||||
A rule that contains an expression referencing the identifier `oldSelf` is implicitly considered a
|
||||
"transition rule". Transition rules allow schema authors to prevent certain transitions between two
|
||||
_transition rule_. Transition rules allow schema authors to prevent certain transitions between two
|
||||
otherwise valid states. For example:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
@@ -1036,33 +1036,40 @@ Errors will be generated on CRD writes if a schema node contains a transition ru
|
||||
applied, e.g. "*path*: update rule *rule* cannot be set on schema because the schema or its parent
|
||||
schema is not mergeable".
|
||||
|
||||
Transition rules are only allowed on "correlatable" portions of a schema.
|
||||
Transition rules are only allowed on _correlatable portions_ of a schema.
|
||||
A portion of the schema is correlatable if all `array` parent schemas are of type `x-kubernetes-list-type=map`; any `set`or `atomic`array parent schemas make it impossible to unambiguously correlate a `self` with `oldSelf`.
|
||||
|
||||
##### Use Cases
|
||||
Here are some examples for transition rules:
|
||||
|
||||
{{< table caption="Transition rules examples" >}}
|
||||
| Use Case | Rule
|
||||
| -------- | --------
|
||||
| Immutability | `self.foo == oldSelf.foo`
|
||||
| Prevent modification/removal once assigned | `oldSelf != 'bar' \|\| self == 'bar'` or `!has(oldSelf.field) \|\| has(self.field)`
|
||||
| Append-only set | `self.all(element, element in oldSelf)`
|
||||
| If previous value was X, new value can only be A or B, not Y or Z | `oldSelf != 'X' \|\| self in ['A', 'B']`
|
||||
| Nondecreasing counters | `self >= oldSelf`
|
||||
| Monotonic (non-decreasing) counters | `self >= oldSelf`
|
||||
{{< /table >}}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Resource Constraints
|
||||
#### Resource use by validation functions
|
||||
|
||||
Resource consumption of validation rules is checked at CustomResourceDefinition creation and update time. If a rule is estimated to be prohibitively expensive to execute, it will result in a validation error. A similar
|
||||
system is used at runtime that observes the actions the interpreter takes. If the interpreter executes
|
||||
When you create or update a CustomResourceDefinition that uses validation rules,
|
||||
the API server checks the likely impact of running those validation rules. If a rule is
|
||||
estimated to be prohibitively expensive to execute, the API server rejects the create
|
||||
or update operation, and returns an error message.
|
||||
A similar system is used at runtime that observes the actions the interpreter takes. If the interpreter executes
|
||||
too many instructions, execution of the rule will be halted, and an error will result.
|
||||
Each CustomResourceDefinition is also allowed a certain amount of resources to finish executing all of
|
||||
its validation rules. If the sum total of its rules are estimated at creation time to go over that limit,
|
||||
then a validation error will also occur.
|
||||
|
||||
In general, both systems will allow rules that do not need to iterate; these rules will
|
||||
always take the same amount of time regardless of how large their input is. `self.foo == 1` will be allowed.
|
||||
But if `foo` is a string and we instead have `self.foo.contains("someString")`, our rule will take
|
||||
longer to execute depending on how long `foo` is. Another example would be if `foo` was an array, and we
|
||||
had a rule `self.foo.all(x, x > 5)`. The cost system will always assume the worst-case scenario if
|
||||
You are unlikely to encounter issues with the resource budget for validation if you only
|
||||
specify rules that always take the same amount of time regardless of how large their input is.
|
||||
For example, a rule that asserts that `self.foo == 1` does not by itself have any
|
||||
risk of rejection on validation resource budget groups.
|
||||
But if `foo` is a string and you define a validation rule `self.foo.contains("someString")`, that rule takes
|
||||
longer to execute depending on how long `foo` is.
|
||||
Another example would be if `foo` were an array, and you specified a validation rule `self.foo.all(x, x > 5)`. The cost system always assumes the worst-case scenario if
|
||||
a limit on the length of `foo` is not given, and this will happen for anything that can be iterated
|
||||
over (lists, maps, etc.).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1081,17 +1088,18 @@ openAPIV3Schema:
|
||||
- rule: "self.all(x, x.contains('a string'))"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The cost system will not allow this rule. Using `self.all` means calling `contains` on every string in `foo`,
|
||||
which in turn will check the given string to see if it contains `'a string'`. Without limits, this is a very
|
||||
expensive rule:
|
||||
|
||||
then the API server rejects this rule on validation budget grounds with error:
|
||||
```
|
||||
spec.validation.openAPIV3Schema.properties[spec].properties[foo].x-kubernetes-validations[0].rule: Forbidden:
|
||||
CEL rule exceeded budget by more than 100x (try simplifying the rule, or adding maxItems, maxProperties, and
|
||||
maxLength where arrays, maps, and strings are used)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Without limits being set, the estimated cost of this rule will exceed the per-rule cost limit. But if we
|
||||
The rejection happens because `self.all` implies calling `contains()` on every string in `foo`,
|
||||
which in turn will check the given string to see if it contains `'a string'`. Without limits, this is a very
|
||||
expensive rule.
|
||||
|
||||
If you do not specify any validation limit, the estimated cost of this rule will exceed the per-rule cost limit. But if you
|
||||
add limits in the appropriate places, the rule will be allowed:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user