Updated dockershim faq (#31765)
* Create updated dockershim FAQ - The current dockershim FAQ is marked as outdated - This new FAQ states clearly "removal" - This new FAQ also has links to additional resources created by the community and others. * deprecation -> removal scrub - It's important this new FAQ says removal rather than deprecation as we're at that moment in time. * Update content/en/blog/_posts/2022-02-16-updated-dockershim-faq.md Did not know Hugo allowed for this. Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com> * Update content/en/blog/_posts/2022-02-16-updated-dockershim-faq.md 🤯 Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com> * Update content/en/blog/_posts/2022-02-16-updated-dockershim-faq.md Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com> * Update content/en/blog/_posts/2022-02-16-updated-dockershim-faq.md Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com> * Update content/en/blog/_posts/2022-02-16-updated-dockershim-faq.md Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com> * Update content/en/blog/_posts/2022-02-16-updated-dockershim-faq.md Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com> * Bump version to 1.23 Warning in 1.23 Removed in 1.24 * Update for today's date Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <tim@scalefactory.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,9 +3,11 @@ layout: blog
|
||||
title: "Dockershim Deprecation FAQ"
|
||||
date: 2020-12-02
|
||||
slug: dockershim-faq
|
||||
aliases: [ '/dockershim' ]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_**Update**: There is a [newer version](/blog/2022/02/17/dockershim-faq/) of this article available._
|
||||
|
||||
This document goes over some frequently asked questions regarding the Dockershim
|
||||
deprecation announced as a part of the Kubernetes v1.20 release. For more detail
|
||||
on the deprecation of Docker as a container runtime for Kubernetes kubelets, and
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
layout: blog
|
||||
title: "Updated: Dockershim Removal FAQ"
|
||||
date: 2022-02-17
|
||||
slug: dockershim-faq
|
||||
aliases: [ '/dockershim' ]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**This is an update to the original [Dockershim Deprecation FAQ](/blog/2020/12/02/dockershim-faq/) article,
|
||||
published in late 2020.**
|
||||
|
||||
This document goes over some frequently asked questions regarding the
|
||||
deprecation and removal of _dockershim_, that was
|
||||
[announced](/blog/2020/12/08/kubernetes-1-20-release-announcement/)
|
||||
as a part of the Kubernetes v1.20 release. For more detail
|
||||
on what that means, check out the blog post
|
||||
[Don't Panic: Kubernetes and Docker](/blog/2020/12/02/dont-panic-kubernetes-and-docker/).
|
||||
|
||||
Also, you can read [check whether dockershim removal affects you](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/migrating-from-dockershim/check-if-dockershim-deprecation-affects-you/)
|
||||
to determine how much impact the removal of dockershim would have for you
|
||||
or for your organization.
|
||||
|
||||
As the Kubernetes 1.24 release has become imminent, we've been working hard to try to make this a smooth transition.
|
||||
|
||||
- We've written a blog post detailing our [commitment and next steps](/blog/2022/01/07/kubernetes-is-moving-on-from-dockershim/).
|
||||
- We believe there are no major blockers to migration to [other container runtimes](/docs/setup/production-environment/container-runtimes/#container-runtimes).
|
||||
- There is also a [Migrating from dockershim](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/migrating-from-dockershim/) guide available.
|
||||
- We've also created a page to list
|
||||
[articles on dockershim removal and on using CRI-compatible runtimes](/docs/reference/node/topics-on-dockershim-and-cri-compatible-runtimes/).
|
||||
That list includes some of the already mentioned docs, and also covers selected external sources
|
||||
(including vendor guides).
|
||||
|
||||
### Why is the dockershim being removed from Kubernetes?
|
||||
|
||||
Early versions of Kubernetes only worked with a specific container runtime:
|
||||
Docker Engine. Later, Kubernetes added support for working with other container runtimes.
|
||||
The CRI standard was [created](/blog/2016/12/container-runtime-interface-cri-in-kubernetes/) to
|
||||
enable interoperability between orchestrators (like Kubernetes) and many different container
|
||||
runtimes.
|
||||
Docker Engine doesn't implement that interface (CRI), so the Kubernetes project created
|
||||
special code to help with the transition, and made that _dockershim_ code part of Kubernetes
|
||||
itself.
|
||||
|
||||
The dockershim code was always intended to be a temporary solution (hence the name: shim).
|
||||
You can read more about the community discussion and planning in the
|
||||
[Dockershim Removal Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal][drkep].
|
||||
In fact, maintaining dockershim had become a heavy burden on the Kubernetes maintainers.
|
||||
|
||||
Additionally, features that were largely incompatible with the dockershim, such
|
||||
as cgroups v2 and user namespaces are being implemented in these newer CRI
|
||||
runtimes. Removing support for the dockershim will allow further development in
|
||||
those areas.
|
||||
|
||||
[drkep]: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-node/2221-remove-dockershim
|
||||
|
||||
### Can I still use Docker Engine in Kubernetes 1.23?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, the only thing changed in 1.20 is a single warning log printed at [kubelet]
|
||||
startup if using Docker Engine as the runtime. You'll see this warning in all versions up to 1.23. The dockershim removal occurs in Kubernetes 1.24.
|
||||
|
||||
[kubelet]: /docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kubelet/
|
||||
|
||||
### When will dockershim be removed?
|
||||
|
||||
Given the impact of this change, we are using an extended deprecation timeline.
|
||||
Removal of dockershim is scheduled for Kubernetes v1.24, see [Dockershim Removal Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal][drkep].
|
||||
The Kubernetes project will be working closely with vendors and other ecosystem groups to ensure
|
||||
a smooth transition and will evaluate things as the situation evolves.
|
||||
|
||||
### Can I still use Docker Engine as my container runtime?
|
||||
|
||||
First off, if you use Docker on your own PC to develop or test containers: nothing changes.
|
||||
You can still use Docker locally no matter what container runtime(s) you use for your
|
||||
Kubernetes clusters. Containers make this kind of interoperability possible.
|
||||
|
||||
Mirantis and Docker have [committed][mirantis] to maintaining a replacement adapter for
|
||||
Docker Engine, and to maintain that adapter even after the in-tree dockershim is removed
|
||||
from Kubernetes. The replacement adapter is named [`cri-dockerd`](https://github.com/Mirantis/cri-dockerd).
|
||||
|
||||
[mirantis]: https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-to-take-over-support-of-kubernetes-dockershim-2/
|
||||
|
||||
### Will my existing container images still work?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, the images produced from `docker build` will work with all CRI implementations.
|
||||
All your existing images will still work exactly the same.
|
||||
|
||||
#### What about private images?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. All CRI runtimes support the same pull secrets configuration used in
|
||||
Kubernetes, either via the PodSpec or ServiceAccount.
|
||||
|
||||
### Are Docker and containers the same thing?
|
||||
|
||||
Docker popularized the Linux containers pattern and has been instrumental in
|
||||
developing the underlying technology, however containers in Linux have existed
|
||||
for a long time. The container ecosystem has grown to be much broader than just
|
||||
Docker. Standards like OCI and CRI have helped many tools grow and thrive in our
|
||||
ecosystem, some replacing aspects of Docker while others enhance existing
|
||||
functionality.
|
||||
|
||||
### Are there examples of folks using other runtimes in production today?
|
||||
|
||||
All Kubernetes project produced artifacts (Kubernetes binaries) are validated
|
||||
with each release.
|
||||
|
||||
Additionally, the [kind] project has been using containerd for some time and has
|
||||
seen an improvement in stability for its use case. Kind and containerd are leveraged
|
||||
multiple times every day to validate any changes to the Kubernetes codebase. Other
|
||||
related projects follow a similar pattern as well, demonstrating the stability and
|
||||
usability of other container runtimes. As an example, OpenShift 4.x has been
|
||||
using the [CRI-O] runtime in production since June 2019.
|
||||
|
||||
For other examples and references you can look at the adopters of containerd and
|
||||
CRI-O, two container runtimes under the Cloud Native Computing Foundation ([CNCF]).
|
||||
|
||||
- [containerd](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/blob/master/ADOPTERS.md)
|
||||
- [CRI-O](https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/master/ADOPTERS.md)
|
||||
|
||||
[CRI-O]: https://cri-o.io/
|
||||
[kind]: https://kind.sigs.k8s.io/
|
||||
[CNCF]: https://cncf.io
|
||||
|
||||
### People keep referencing OCI, what is that?
|
||||
|
||||
OCI stands for the [Open Container Initiative], which standardized many of the
|
||||
interfaces between container tools and technologies. They maintain a standard
|
||||
specification for packaging container images (OCI image-spec) and running containers
|
||||
(OCI runtime-spec). They also maintain an actual implementation of the runtime-spec
|
||||
in the form of [runc], which is the underlying default runtime for both
|
||||
[containerd] and [CRI-O]. The CRI builds on these low-level specifications to
|
||||
provide an end-to-end standard for managing containers.
|
||||
|
||||
[Open Container Initiative]: https://opencontainers.org/about/overview/
|
||||
[runc]: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc
|
||||
[containerd]: https://containerd.io/
|
||||
|
||||
### Which CRI implementation should I use?
|
||||
|
||||
That’s a complex question and it depends on a lot of factors. If Docker is
|
||||
working for you, moving to containerd should be a relatively easy swap and
|
||||
will have strictly better performance and less overhead. However, we encourage you
|
||||
to explore all the options from the [CNCF landscape] in case another would be an
|
||||
even better fit for your environment.
|
||||
|
||||
[CNCF landscape]: https://landscape.cncf.io/card-mode?category=container-runtime&grouping=category
|
||||
|
||||
### What should I look out for when changing CRI implementations?
|
||||
|
||||
While the underlying containerization code is the same between Docker and most
|
||||
CRIs (including containerd), there are a few differences around the edges. Some
|
||||
common things to consider when migrating are:
|
||||
|
||||
- Logging configuration
|
||||
- Runtime resource limitations
|
||||
- Node provisioning scripts that call docker or use docker via it's control socket
|
||||
- Kubectl plugins that require docker CLI or the control socket
|
||||
- Tools from the Kubernetes project that require direct access to Docker Engine
|
||||
(for example: the deprecated `kube-imagepuller` tool)
|
||||
- Configuration of functionality like `registry-mirrors` and insecure registries
|
||||
- Other support scripts or daemons that expect Docker Engine to be available and are run
|
||||
outside of Kubernetes (for example, monitoring or security agents)
|
||||
outside of Kubernetes (e.g. monitoring or security agents)
|
||||
- GPUs or special hardware and how they integrate with your runtime and Kubernetes
|
||||
|
||||
If you use Kubernetes resource requests/limits or file-based log collection
|
||||
DaemonSets then they will continue to work the same, but if you’ve customized
|
||||
your `dockerd` configuration, you’ll need to adapt that for your new container
|
||||
runtime where possible.
|
||||
|
||||
Another thing to look out for is anything expecting to run for system maintenance
|
||||
or nested inside a container when building images will no longer work. For the
|
||||
former, you can use the [`crictl`][cr] tool as a drop-in replacement (see [mapping from docker cli to crictl](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/debug-application-cluster/crictl/#mapping-from-docker-cli-to-crictl)) and for the
|
||||
latter you can use newer container build options like [img], [buildah],
|
||||
[kaniko], or [buildkit-cli-for-kubectl] that don’t require Docker.
|
||||
|
||||
[cr]: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools
|
||||
[img]: https://github.com/genuinetools/img
|
||||
[buildah]: https://github.com/containers/buildah
|
||||
[kaniko]: https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/kaniko
|
||||
[buildkit-cli-for-kubectl]: https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/buildkit-cli-for-kubectl
|
||||
|
||||
For containerd, you can start with their [documentation] to see what configuration
|
||||
options are available as you migrate things over.
|
||||
|
||||
[documentation]: https://github.com/containerd/cri/blob/master/docs/registry.md
|
||||
|
||||
For instructions on how to use containerd and CRI-O with Kubernetes, see the
|
||||
Kubernetes documentation on [Container Runtimes]
|
||||
|
||||
[Container Runtimes]: /docs/setup/production-environment/container-runtimes/
|
||||
|
||||
### What if I have more questions?
|
||||
|
||||
If you use a vendor-supported Kubernetes distribution, you can ask them about
|
||||
upgrade plans for their products. For end-user questions, please post them
|
||||
to our end user community forum: https://discuss.kubernetes.io/.
|
||||
|
||||
You can also check out the excellent blog post
|
||||
[Wait, Docker is deprecated in Kubernetes now?][dep] a more in-depth technical
|
||||
discussion of the changes.
|
||||
|
||||
[dep]: https://dev.to/inductor/wait-docker-is-deprecated-in-kubernetes-now-what-do-i-do-e4m
|
||||
|
||||
### Can I have a hug?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, we're still giving hugs as requested. 🤗🤗🤗
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user