Correct minor error (#9690)

Technically speaking SRV targets are address record names, not CNAMEs.  In fact, the SRV RFC states that SRV targets must point to an address record name, and cannot be an alias (e.g. CNAME).
This commit is contained in:
Chris O'Haver
2018-07-31 18:14:39 -04:00
committed by k8s-ci-robot
parent 80e659ce9f
commit 0f9262b8eb
@@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ SRV Records are created for named ports that are part of normal or [Headless
Services](/docs/concepts/services-networking/service/#headless-services).
For each named port, the SRV record would have the form
`_my-port-name._my-port-protocol.my-svc.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local`.
For a regular service, this resolves to the port number and the CNAME:
For a regular service, this resolves to the port number and the domain name:
`my-svc.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local`.
For a headless service, this resolves to multiple answers, one for each pod
that is backing the service, and contains the port number and a CNAME of the pod
that is backing the service, and contains the port number and the domain name of the pod
of the form `auto-generated-name.my-svc.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local`.
## Pods