Correct minor error (#9690)
Technically speaking SRV targets are address record names, not CNAMEs. In fact, the SRV RFC states that SRV targets must point to an address record name, and cannot be an alias (e.g. CNAME).
This commit is contained in:
committed by
k8s-ci-robot
parent
80e659ce9f
commit
0f9262b8eb
@@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ SRV Records are created for named ports that are part of normal or [Headless
|
||||
Services](/docs/concepts/services-networking/service/#headless-services).
|
||||
For each named port, the SRV record would have the form
|
||||
`_my-port-name._my-port-protocol.my-svc.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local`.
|
||||
For a regular service, this resolves to the port number and the CNAME:
|
||||
For a regular service, this resolves to the port number and the domain name:
|
||||
`my-svc.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local`.
|
||||
For a headless service, this resolves to multiple answers, one for each pod
|
||||
that is backing the service, and contains the port number and a CNAME of the pod
|
||||
that is backing the service, and contains the port number and the domain name of the pod
|
||||
of the form `auto-generated-name.my-svc.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pods
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user