Encrypting secrets at rest and cluster security guide
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
assignees:
|
||||
- smarterclayton
|
||||
title: Securing a Cluster
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
* TOC
|
||||
{:toc}
|
||||
|
||||
This document covers topics related to protecting a cluster from accidental or malicious access
|
||||
and provides recommendations on overall security.
|
||||
|
||||
## Controlling access to the Kubernetes API
|
||||
|
||||
As Kubernetes is entirely API driven, controlling and limiting who can access the cluster and what actions
|
||||
they are allowed to perform is the first line of defense.
|
||||
|
||||
### Use Transport Level Security (TLS) for all API traffic
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes expects that all API communication in the cluster is encrypted by default with TLS, and the
|
||||
majority of installation methods will allow the necessary certificates to be created and distributed to
|
||||
the cluster components. Note that some components and installation methods may enable local ports over
|
||||
HTTP and administrators should familiarize themselves with the settings of each component to identify
|
||||
potentially unsecured traffic.
|
||||
|
||||
### API Authentication
|
||||
|
||||
Choose an authentication mechanism for the API servers to use that matches the common access patterns
|
||||
when you install a cluster. For instance, small single user clusters may wish to use a simple certificate
|
||||
or static Bearer token approach. Larger clusters may wish to integrate an existing or OIDC or LDAP server that
|
||||
allow users to be subdivided into groups.
|
||||
|
||||
All API clients must be authenticated, even those that are part of the infrastructure like nodes,
|
||||
proxies, the scheduler, and volume plugins. These clients are typically [service accounts](/docs/admin/service-accounts-admin.md) and are created automatically at cluster startup.
|
||||
|
||||
Consult the [authentication reference document](/docs/admin/authentication.md) for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
### API Authorization
|
||||
|
||||
Once authenticated, every API call is also expected to pass an authorization check. Kubernetes ships an
|
||||
integrated Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) component that matches an incoming user or group to a
|
||||
set of permissions bundled into roles. These permissions combine verbs (get, create, delete) with
|
||||
resources (pods, services, nodes) and can be namespace or cluster scoped. A set of out of the box
|
||||
roles are provided that offer reasonable default separation of responsibilty depending on what actions
|
||||
a client might want to perform.
|
||||
|
||||
As with authentication, simple and broad roles may be appropriate for smaller clusters, but as
|
||||
more users interact with the cluster, it may become necessary to separate teams into separate
|
||||
namespaces with more limited roles.
|
||||
|
||||
With authorization it is important to understand how updates on one object may cause actions in
|
||||
other places. For instance, a user may not be able to create pods directly, but allowing them to
|
||||
create a deployment (which creates pods on their behalf) will let them create those pods
|
||||
indirectly. Likewise deleting a node from the API will result in the pods scheduled to that node
|
||||
being terminated and recreated on other nodes. The out of the box roles represent a compromise
|
||||
between flexibility and the common use cases, but more limited roles should be carefully reviewed
|
||||
to prevent accidental escalation.
|
||||
|
||||
Consult the [authorization reference section](/docs/admin/authorization) for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Controlling the capabilities of a workload or user at runtime
|
||||
|
||||
Authorization in Kubernetes is intentionally high level, focused on coarse actions on resources.
|
||||
More powerful controls exist as **policies** to limit by use case how those objects act on the
|
||||
cluster, themselves, and other resources.
|
||||
|
||||
### Limiting resource usage on a cluster
|
||||
|
||||
[Resource quota](/docs/concepts/policy/resource-quotas.md) limits the number or capacity of
|
||||
resources granted to a namespace. This is most often used to limit the amount of CPU, memory,
|
||||
or persistent disk a namespace can allocate, but can also control how many pods, services, or
|
||||
volumes exist in each namespace.
|
||||
|
||||
[Limit ranges](/docs/admin/limitrange) restrict the maximum or minimum size of some of the
|
||||
resources above, to prevent users from requesting unreasonably high or low values for commonly
|
||||
reserved resources like memory, or to provide default limits when none are specified.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Controlling what privileges containers run with
|
||||
|
||||
A pod definition contains a [security context](/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/security-context.md)
|
||||
that allows it to request access to running as a specific Linux user on a node (like root),
|
||||
access to run privileged or access the host network, and other controls that would otherwise
|
||||
allow it to run unfettered on a hosting node. [Pod security policies](/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy.md)
|
||||
can limit which users or service accounts can provide dangerous security context settings.
|
||||
|
||||
Generally, most application workloads need limited access to host resources so they can
|
||||
successfully run as a root process (uid 0) without access to host information. However,
|
||||
considering the privileges associated with the root user, you should write application
|
||||
containers to run as a non-root user. Similarly, administrators who wish to prevent
|
||||
client applications from escaping their containers should use a restrictive pod security
|
||||
policy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Restricting network access
|
||||
|
||||
The [network policy](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/declare-network-policy.md) for a namespace
|
||||
allows application authors to restrict which pods in other namespaces may access pods and ports
|
||||
within their namespace. Many of the supported [Kubernetes networking providers](/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/networking.md)
|
||||
now respect network policy.
|
||||
|
||||
Quota and limit ranges can also be used to control whether users may request node ports or
|
||||
load balanced services, which on many clusters can control whether those users applications
|
||||
are visible outside of the cluster.
|
||||
|
||||
Additional protections may be available that control network rules on a per plugin or per
|
||||
environment basis, such as per-node firewalls, physically separating cluster nodes to
|
||||
prevent cross talk, or advanced networking policy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Controlling which nodes pods may access
|
||||
|
||||
By default there are no limits on which nodes a pod may run. Kubernetes offers a
|
||||
[rich set of policies for controlling placement of pods onto nodes](/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node.md)
|
||||
that are available to end users. For many clusters use of these policies to separate workloads
|
||||
can be a convention that authors adopt or enforce via tooling.
|
||||
|
||||
As an administrator, a beta admission plugin `PodNodeSelector` can be used to force pods
|
||||
within a namespace to default or require a specific node selector, and if end users cannot
|
||||
alter namespaces, this can strongly limit the placement of all of the pods in a specific workload.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Protecting cluster components from compromise
|
||||
|
||||
This section describes some common patterns for protecting clusters from compromise.
|
||||
|
||||
### Restrict access to etcd
|
||||
|
||||
Write access to the etcd backend for the API is equivalent to gaining root on the entire cluster,
|
||||
and read access can be used to escalate fairly quickly. Administrators should always use strong
|
||||
credentials from the API servers to their etcd server, such as mutual auth via TLS client certificates,
|
||||
and it is often recommended to isolate the etcd servers behind a firewall that only the API servers
|
||||
may access.
|
||||
|
||||
**CAUTION:** Allowing other components within the cluster to access the master etcd instance with
|
||||
read or write access to the full keyspace is equivalent to granting cluster-admin access. Using
|
||||
separate etcd instances for non-master components or using etcd ACLs to restrict read and write
|
||||
access to a subset of the keyspace is strongly recommended.
|
||||
|
||||
### Enable audit logging
|
||||
|
||||
The [audit logger](/docs/admin/audit/) is an alpha feature that records actions taken by the
|
||||
API for later analysis in the event of a compromise. It is recommended to enable audit logging
|
||||
and archive the audit file on a secure server.
|
||||
|
||||
### Restrict access to alpha or beta features
|
||||
|
||||
Alpha and beta Kubernetes features are in active development and may have limitations or bugs
|
||||
that result in security vulnerabilities. Always assess the value an alpha or beta feature may
|
||||
provide against the possible risk to your security posture. When in doubt, disable features you
|
||||
do not use.
|
||||
|
||||
### Rotate infrastructure credentials frequently
|
||||
|
||||
The shorter the lifetime of a secret or credential the harder it is for an attacker to make
|
||||
use of that credential. Set short lifetimes on certificates and automate their rotation. Use
|
||||
an authentication provider that can control how long issued tokens are available and use short
|
||||
lifetimes where possible. If you use service account tokens in external integrations plan to
|
||||
rotate those tokens frequently.
|
||||
|
||||
### Review third party integrations before enabling them
|
||||
|
||||
Many third party integrations to Kubernetes may alter the security profile of your cluster. When
|
||||
enabling an integration, always review the permissions that extension requests before granting
|
||||
it access. For example, many security integrations may request access to view all secrets on
|
||||
your cluster which is effectively making that component a cluster admin. When in doubt,
|
||||
restrict the integration to functioning in a single namespace if possible.
|
||||
|
||||
Components that create pods may also be unexpectedly powerful if they can do so inside namespaces
|
||||
like the `kube-system` namespace, because those pods can gain access to service account secrets
|
||||
or run with elevated permissions if those service accounts are granted access to permissive
|
||||
[pod security policies](/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### Encrypt secrets at rest
|
||||
|
||||
In general, the etcd database will contain any information accessible via the Kubernetes API
|
||||
and may grant an attacker significant visibility into the state of your cluster. Always encrypt
|
||||
your backups using a well reviewed backup and encryption solution, and consider using full disk
|
||||
encryption where possible.
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes 1.7 contains an alpha feature that will encrypt `Secret` resources in etcd, preventing
|
||||
parties that gain access to your etcd backups from viewing the content of those secrets. While
|
||||
this feature is currently experimental, it may offer an additional level of defence when backups
|
||||
are not encrypted or an attacker gains read access to etcd.
|
||||
|
||||
### Receiving alerts for security updates and reporting vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
Join the [kubernetes-announce](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/kubernetes-announce)
|
||||
group for emails about security announcements. See the [security reporting](/docs/reference/security.md)
|
||||
page for more on how to report vulnerabilities.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user