From f5bfa04aa44f02cf987a64aafc7155089152c440 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Zhukov Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:32:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix the typo (#18732) "AND of exact match" in the "Affinity and anti-affinity" section should be "AND or exact match" --- content/en/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/en/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node.md b/content/en/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node.md index 14c8d230b6..9a51a1d294 100644 --- a/content/en/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node.md +++ b/content/en/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node.md @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ For example, `example.com.node-restriction.kubernetes.io/fips=true` or `example. `nodeSelector` provides a very simple way to constrain pods to nodes with particular labels. The affinity/anti-affinity feature, greatly expands the types of constraints you can express. The key enhancements are -1. the language is more expressive (not just "AND of exact match") +1. the language is more expressive (not just "AND or exact match") 2. you can indicate that the rule is "soft"/"preference" rather than a hard requirement, so if the scheduler can't satisfy it, the pod will still be scheduled 3. you can constrain against labels on other pods running on the node (or other topological domain),