Move Guide topic: Reserve Compute Resources. (#3382)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ toc:
|
|||||||
section:
|
section:
|
||||||
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/overview.md
|
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/overview.md
|
||||||
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/assign-pods-nodes.md
|
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/assign-pods-nodes.md
|
||||||
|
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/reserve-compute-resources.md
|
||||||
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/dns-horizontal-autoscaling.md
|
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/dns-horizontal-autoscaling.md
|
||||||
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/safely-drain-node.md
|
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/safely-drain-node.md
|
||||||
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/change-pv-reclaim-policy.md
|
- docs/tasks/administer-cluster/change-pv-reclaim-policy.md
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -6,225 +6,6 @@ assignees:
|
|||||||
title: Reserving Compute Resources for System Daemons
|
title: Reserving Compute Resources for System Daemons
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* TOC
|
{% include user-guide-content-moved.md %}
|
||||||
{:toc}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Kubernetes nodes can be scheduled to `Capacity`. Pods can consume all the
|
|
||||||
available capacity on a node by default. This is an issue because nodes
|
|
||||||
typically run quite a few system daemons that power the OS and Kubernetes
|
|
||||||
itself. Unless resources are set aside for these system daemons, pods and system
|
|
||||||
daemons compete for resources and lead to resource starvation issues on the
|
|
||||||
node.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The `kubelet` exposes a feature named `Node Allocatable` that helps to reserve
|
|
||||||
compute resources for system daemons. Kubernetes recommends cluster
|
|
||||||
administrators to configure `Node Allocatable` based on their workload density
|
|
||||||
on each node.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Node Allocatable
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```text
|
|
||||||
Node Capacity
|
|
||||||
---------------------------
|
|
||||||
| kube-reserved |
|
|
||||||
|-------------------------|
|
|
||||||
| system-reserved |
|
|
||||||
|-------------------------|
|
|
||||||
| eviction-threshold |
|
|
||||||
|-------------------------|
|
|
||||||
| |
|
|
||||||
| allocatable |
|
|
||||||
| (available for pods) |
|
|
||||||
| |
|
|
||||||
| |
|
|
||||||
---------------------------
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
`Allocatable` on a Kubernetes node is defined as the amount of compute resources
|
|
||||||
that are available for pods. The scheduler does not over-subscribe
|
|
||||||
`Allocatable`. `CPU` and `memory` are supported as of now. Support for `storage`
|
|
||||||
is expected to be added in the future.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Node Allocatable is exposed as part of `v1.Node` object in the API and as part
|
|
||||||
of `kubectl describe node` in the CLI.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Resources can be reserved for two categories of system daemons in the `kubelet`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Enabling QoS and Pod level cgroups
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To properly enforce node allocatable constraints on the node, you must
|
|
||||||
enable the new cgroup hierarchy via the `--cgroups-per-qos` flag. This flag is
|
|
||||||
enabled by default. When enabled, the `kubelet` will parent all end-user pods
|
|
||||||
under a cgroup hierarchy managed by the `kubelet`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Configuring a cgroup driver
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The `kubelet` supports manipulation of the cgroup hierarchy on
|
|
||||||
the host using a cgroup driver. The driver is configured via the
|
|
||||||
`--cgroup-driver` flag.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The supported values are the following:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* `cgroupfs` is the default driver that performs direct manipulation of the
|
|
||||||
cgroup filesystem on the host in order to manage cgroup sandboxes.
|
|
||||||
* `systemd` is an alternative driver that manages cgroup sandboxes using
|
|
||||||
transient slices for resources that are supported by that init system.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Depending on the configuration of the associated container runtime,
|
|
||||||
operators may have to choose a particular cgroup driver to ensure
|
|
||||||
proper system behavior. For example, if operators use the `systemd`
|
|
||||||
cgroup driver provided by the `docker` runtime, the `kubelet` must
|
|
||||||
be configured to use the `systemd` cgroup driver.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Kube Reserved
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--kube-reserved=[cpu=100m][,][memory=100Mi]`
|
|
||||||
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--kube-reserved-cgroup=`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
`kube-reserved` is meant to capture resource reservation for kubernetes system
|
|
||||||
daemons like the `kubelet`, `container runtime`, `node problem detector`, etc.
|
|
||||||
It is not meant to reserve resources for system daemons that are run as pods.
|
|
||||||
`kube-reserved` is typically a function of `pod density` on the nodes. [This
|
|
||||||
performance dashboard](http://node-perf-dash.k8s.io/#/builds) exposes `cpu` and
|
|
||||||
`memory` usage profiles of `kubelet` and `docker engine` at multiple levels of
|
|
||||||
pod density. [This blog
|
|
||||||
post](http://blog.kubernetes.io/2016/11/visualize-kubelet-performance-with-node-dashboard.html)
|
|
||||||
explains how the dashboard can be interpreted to come up with a suitable
|
|
||||||
`kube-reserved` reservation.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To optionally enforce `kube-reserved` on system daemons, specify the parent
|
|
||||||
control group for kube daemons as the value for `--kube-reserved-cgroup` kubelet
|
|
||||||
flag.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It is recommended that the kubernetes system daemons are placed under a top
|
|
||||||
level control group (`runtime.slice` on systemd machines for example). Each
|
|
||||||
system daemon should ideally run within its own child control group. Refer to
|
|
||||||
[this
|
|
||||||
doc](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/node-allocatable.md#recommended-cgroups-setup)
|
|
||||||
for more details on recommended control group hierarchy.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Note that Kubelet **does not** create `--kube-reserved-cgroup` if it doesn't
|
|
||||||
exist. Kubelet will fail if an invalid cgroup is specified.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### System Reserved
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--system-reserved=[cpu=100mi][,][memory=100Mi]`
|
|
||||||
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--system-reserved-cgroup=`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
`system-reserved` is meant to capture resource reservation for OS system daemons
|
|
||||||
like `sshd`, `udev`, etc. `system-reserved` should reserve `memory` for the
|
|
||||||
`kernel` too since `kernel` memory is not accounted to pods in Kubernetes at this time.
|
|
||||||
Reserving resources for user login sessions is also recommended (`user.slice` in
|
|
||||||
systemd world).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To optionally enforce `system-reserved` on system daemons, specify the parent
|
|
||||||
control group for OS system daemons as the value for `--system-reserved-cgroup`
|
|
||||||
kubelet flag.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It is recommended that the OS system daemons are placed under a top level
|
|
||||||
control group (`system.slice` on systemd machines for example).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Note that Kubelet **does not** create `--system-reserved-cgroup` if it doesn't
|
|
||||||
exist. Kubelet will fail if an invalid cgroup is specified.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Eviction Thresholds
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--eviction-hard=[memory.available<500Mi]`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Memory pressure at the node level leads to System OOMs which affects the entire
|
|
||||||
node and all pods running on it. Nodes can go offline temporarily until memory
|
|
||||||
has been reclaimed. To avoid (or reduce the probability of) system OOMs kubelet
|
|
||||||
provides [`Out of Resource`](./out-of-resource.md) management. Evictions are
|
|
||||||
supported for `memory` and `storage` only. By reserving some memory via
|
|
||||||
`--eviction-hard` flag, the `kubelet` attempts to `evict` pods whenever memory
|
|
||||||
availability on the node drops below the reserved value. Hypothetically, if
|
|
||||||
system daemons did not exist on a node, pods cannot use more than `capacity -
|
|
||||||
eviction-hard`. For this reason, resources reserved for evictions are not
|
|
||||||
available for pods.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Enforcing Node Allocatable
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--enforce-node-allocatable=pods[,][system-reserved][,][kube-reserved]`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The scheduler treats `Allocatable` as the available `capacity` for pods.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
`kubelet` enforce `Allocatable` across pods by default. Enforcement is performed
|
|
||||||
by evicting pods whenever the overall usage across all pods exceeds
|
|
||||||
`Allocatable`. More details on eviction policy can be found
|
|
||||||
[here](./out-of-resource.md#eviction-policy) This enforcement is controlled by
|
|
||||||
specifying `pods` value to the kubelet flag `--enforce-node-allocatable`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Optionally, `kubelet` can be made to enforce `kube-reserved` and
|
|
||||||
`system-reserved` by specifying `kube-reserved` & `system-reserved` values in
|
|
||||||
the same flag. Note that to enforce `kube-reserved` or `system-reserved`,
|
|
||||||
`--kube-reserved-cgroup` or `--system-reserved-cgroup` needs to be specified
|
|
||||||
respectively.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## General Guidelines
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
System daemons are expected to be treated similar to `Guaranteed` pods. System
|
|
||||||
daemons can burst within their bounding control groups and this behavior needs
|
|
||||||
to be managed as part of kubernetes deployments. For example, `kubelet` should
|
|
||||||
have its own control group and share `Kube-reserved` resources with the
|
|
||||||
container runtime. However, Kubelet cannot burst and use up all available Node
|
|
||||||
resources if `kube-reserved` is enforced.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Be extra careful while enforcing `system-reserved` reservation since it can lead
|
|
||||||
to critical system services being CPU starved or OOM killed on the node. The
|
|
||||||
recommendation is to enforce `system-reserved` only if a user has profiled their
|
|
||||||
nodes exhaustively to come up with precise estimates and is confident in their
|
|
||||||
ability to recover if any process in that group is oom_killed.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* To begin with enforce `Allocatable` on `pods`.
|
|
||||||
* Once adequate monitoring and alerting is in place to track kube system
|
|
||||||
daemons, attempt to enforce `kube-reserved` based on usage heuristics.
|
|
||||||
* If absolutely necessary, enforce `system-reserved` over time.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The resource requirements of kube system daemons may grow over time as more and
|
|
||||||
more features are added. Over time, kubernetes project will attempt to bring
|
|
||||||
down utilization of node system daemons, but that is not a priority as of now.
|
|
||||||
So expect a drop in `Allocatable` capacity in future releases.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Example Scenario
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here is an example to illustrate Node Allocatable computation:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Node has `32Gi` of `memory` and `16 CPUs`
|
|
||||||
* `--kube-reserved` is set to `cpu=1,memory=2Gi`
|
|
||||||
* `--system-reserved` is set to `cpu=500m,memory=1Gi`
|
|
||||||
* `--eviction-hard` is set to `memory.available<500Mi`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Under this scenario, `Allocatable` will be `14.5 CPUs` & `28.5Gi` of memory.
|
|
||||||
Scheduler ensures that the total `requests` across all pods on this node does
|
|
||||||
not exceed `28.5Gi`. Kubelet evicts pods whenever the overall memory usage
|
|
||||||
exceeds across pods exceed `28.5Gi`. If all processes on the node consume as
|
|
||||||
much CPU as they can, pods together cannot consume more than `14.5 CPUs`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If `kube-reserved` and/or `system-reserved` is not enforced and system daemons
|
|
||||||
exceed their reservation, `kubelet` evicts pods whenever the overall node memory
|
|
||||||
usage is higher than `31.5Gi`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Feature Availability
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As of Kubernetes version 1.2, it has been possible to **optionally** specify
|
|
||||||
`kube-reserved` and `system-reserved` reservations. The scheduler switched to
|
|
||||||
using `Allocatable` instead of `Capacity` when available in the same release.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As of Kubernetes version 1.6, `eviction-thresholds` are being considered by
|
|
||||||
computing `Allocatable`. To revert to the old behavior set
|
|
||||||
`--experimental-allocatable-ignore-eviction` kubelet flag to `true`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As of Kubernetes version 1.6, `kubelet` enforces `Allocatable` on pods using
|
|
||||||
control groups. To revert to the old behavior unset `--enforce-node-allocatable`
|
|
||||||
kubelet flag. Note that unless `--kube-reserved`, or `--system-reserved` or
|
|
||||||
`--eviction-hard` flags have non-default values, `Allocatable` enforcement does
|
|
||||||
not affect existing deployments.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As of Kubernetes version 1.6, `kubelet` launches pods in their own cgroup
|
|
||||||
sandbox in a dedicated part of the cgroup hierarchy it manages. Operators are
|
|
||||||
required to drain their nodes prior to upgrade of the `kubelet` from prior
|
|
||||||
versions in order to ensure pods and their associated containers are launched in
|
|
||||||
the proper part of the cgroup hierarchy.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Reserving Compute Resources for System Daemons](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/reserve-compute-resources/)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
assignees:
|
||||||
|
- vishh
|
||||||
|
- derekwaynecarr
|
||||||
|
- dashpole
|
||||||
|
title: Reserving Compute Resources for System Daemons
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* TOC
|
||||||
|
{:toc}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Kubernetes nodes can be scheduled to `Capacity`. Pods can consume all the
|
||||||
|
available capacity on a node by default. This is an issue because nodes
|
||||||
|
typically run quite a few system daemons that power the OS and Kubernetes
|
||||||
|
itself. Unless resources are set aside for these system daemons, pods and system
|
||||||
|
daemons compete for resources and lead to resource starvation issues on the
|
||||||
|
node.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The `kubelet` exposes a feature named `Node Allocatable` that helps to reserve
|
||||||
|
compute resources for system daemons. Kubernetes recommends cluster
|
||||||
|
administrators to configure `Node Allocatable` based on their workload density
|
||||||
|
on each node.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Node Allocatable
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Node Capacity
|
||||||
|
---------------------------
|
||||||
|
| kube-reserved |
|
||||||
|
|-------------------------|
|
||||||
|
| system-reserved |
|
||||||
|
|-------------------------|
|
||||||
|
| eviction-threshold |
|
||||||
|
|-------------------------|
|
||||||
|
| |
|
||||||
|
| allocatable |
|
||||||
|
| (available for pods) |
|
||||||
|
| |
|
||||||
|
| |
|
||||||
|
---------------------------
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`Allocatable` on a Kubernetes node is defined as the amount of compute resources
|
||||||
|
that are available for pods. The scheduler does not over-subscribe
|
||||||
|
`Allocatable`. `CPU` and `memory` are supported as of now. Support for `storage`
|
||||||
|
is expected to be added in the future.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Node Allocatable is exposed as part of `v1.Node` object in the API and as part
|
||||||
|
of `kubectl describe node` in the CLI.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Resources can be reserved for two categories of system daemons in the `kubelet`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Enabling QoS and Pod level cgroups
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To properly enforce node allocatable constraints on the node, you must
|
||||||
|
enable the new cgroup hierarchy via the `--cgroups-per-qos` flag. This flag is
|
||||||
|
enabled by default. When enabled, the `kubelet` will parent all end-user pods
|
||||||
|
under a cgroup hierarchy managed by the `kubelet`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Configuring a cgroup driver
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The `kubelet` supports manipulation of the cgroup hierarchy on
|
||||||
|
the host using a cgroup driver. The driver is configured via the
|
||||||
|
`--cgroup-driver` flag.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The supported values are the following:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* `cgroupfs` is the default driver that performs direct manipulation of the
|
||||||
|
cgroup filesystem on the host in order to manage cgroup sandboxes.
|
||||||
|
* `systemd` is an alternative driver that manages cgroup sandboxes using
|
||||||
|
transient slices for resources that are supported by that init system.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Depending on the configuration of the associated container runtime,
|
||||||
|
operators may have to choose a particular cgroup driver to ensure
|
||||||
|
proper system behavior. For example, if operators use the `systemd`
|
||||||
|
cgroup driver provided by the `docker` runtime, the `kubelet` must
|
||||||
|
be configured to use the `systemd` cgroup driver.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Kube Reserved
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--kube-reserved=[cpu=100m][,][memory=100Mi]`
|
||||||
|
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--kube-reserved-cgroup=`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`kube-reserved` is meant to capture resource reservation for kubernetes system
|
||||||
|
daemons like the `kubelet`, `container runtime`, `node problem detector`, etc.
|
||||||
|
It is not meant to reserve resources for system daemons that are run as pods.
|
||||||
|
`kube-reserved` is typically a function of `pod density` on the nodes. [This
|
||||||
|
performance dashboard](http://node-perf-dash.k8s.io/#/builds) exposes `cpu` and
|
||||||
|
`memory` usage profiles of `kubelet` and `docker engine` at multiple levels of
|
||||||
|
pod density. [This blog
|
||||||
|
post](http://blog.kubernetes.io/2016/11/visualize-kubelet-performance-with-node-dashboard.html)
|
||||||
|
explains how the dashboard can be interpreted to come up with a suitable
|
||||||
|
`kube-reserved` reservation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To optionally enforce `kube-reserved` on system daemons, specify the parent
|
||||||
|
control group for kube daemons as the value for `--kube-reserved-cgroup` kubelet
|
||||||
|
flag.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It is recommended that the kubernetes system daemons are placed under a top
|
||||||
|
level control group (`runtime.slice` on systemd machines for example). Each
|
||||||
|
system daemon should ideally run within its own child control group. Refer to
|
||||||
|
[this
|
||||||
|
doc](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/node-allocatable.md#recommended-cgroups-setup)
|
||||||
|
for more details on recommended control group hierarchy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note that Kubelet **does not** create `--kube-reserved-cgroup` if it doesn't
|
||||||
|
exist. Kubelet will fail if an invalid cgroup is specified.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### System Reserved
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--system-reserved=[cpu=100mi][,][memory=100Mi]`
|
||||||
|
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--system-reserved-cgroup=`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`system-reserved` is meant to capture resource reservation for OS system daemons
|
||||||
|
like `sshd`, `udev`, etc. `system-reserved` should reserve `memory` for the
|
||||||
|
`kernel` too since `kernel` memory is not accounted to pods in Kubernetes at this time.
|
||||||
|
Reserving resources for user login sessions is also recommended (`user.slice` in
|
||||||
|
systemd world).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To optionally enforce `system-reserved` on system daemons, specify the parent
|
||||||
|
control group for OS system daemons as the value for `--system-reserved-cgroup`
|
||||||
|
kubelet flag.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It is recommended that the OS system daemons are placed under a top level
|
||||||
|
control group (`system.slice` on systemd machines for example).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note that Kubelet **does not** create `--system-reserved-cgroup` if it doesn't
|
||||||
|
exist. Kubelet will fail if an invalid cgroup is specified.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Eviction Thresholds
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--eviction-hard=[memory.available<500Mi]`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Memory pressure at the node level leads to System OOMs which affects the entire
|
||||||
|
node and all pods running on it. Nodes can go offline temporarily until memory
|
||||||
|
has been reclaimed. To avoid (or reduce the probability of) system OOMs kubelet
|
||||||
|
provides [`Out of Resource`](./out-of-resource.md) management. Evictions are
|
||||||
|
supported for `memory` and `storage` only. By reserving some memory via
|
||||||
|
`--eviction-hard` flag, the `kubelet` attempts to `evict` pods whenever memory
|
||||||
|
availability on the node drops below the reserved value. Hypothetically, if
|
||||||
|
system daemons did not exist on a node, pods cannot use more than `capacity -
|
||||||
|
eviction-hard`. For this reason, resources reserved for evictions are not
|
||||||
|
available for pods.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Enforcing Node Allocatable
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Kubelet Flag**: `--enforce-node-allocatable=pods[,][system-reserved][,][kube-reserved]`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The scheduler treats `Allocatable` as the available `capacity` for pods.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`kubelet` enforce `Allocatable` across pods by default. Enforcement is performed
|
||||||
|
by evicting pods whenever the overall usage across all pods exceeds
|
||||||
|
`Allocatable`. More details on eviction policy can be found
|
||||||
|
[here](./out-of-resource.md#eviction-policy) This enforcement is controlled by
|
||||||
|
specifying `pods` value to the kubelet flag `--enforce-node-allocatable`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Optionally, `kubelet` can be made to enforce `kube-reserved` and
|
||||||
|
`system-reserved` by specifying `kube-reserved` & `system-reserved` values in
|
||||||
|
the same flag. Note that to enforce `kube-reserved` or `system-reserved`,
|
||||||
|
`--kube-reserved-cgroup` or `--system-reserved-cgroup` needs to be specified
|
||||||
|
respectively.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## General Guidelines
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
System daemons are expected to be treated similar to `Guaranteed` pods. System
|
||||||
|
daemons can burst within their bounding control groups and this behavior needs
|
||||||
|
to be managed as part of kubernetes deployments. For example, `kubelet` should
|
||||||
|
have its own control group and share `Kube-reserved` resources with the
|
||||||
|
container runtime. However, Kubelet cannot burst and use up all available Node
|
||||||
|
resources if `kube-reserved` is enforced.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Be extra careful while enforcing `system-reserved` reservation since it can lead
|
||||||
|
to critical system services being CPU starved or OOM killed on the node. The
|
||||||
|
recommendation is to enforce `system-reserved` only if a user has profiled their
|
||||||
|
nodes exhaustively to come up with precise estimates and is confident in their
|
||||||
|
ability to recover if any process in that group is oom_killed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* To begin with enforce `Allocatable` on `pods`.
|
||||||
|
* Once adequate monitoring and alerting is in place to track kube system
|
||||||
|
daemons, attempt to enforce `kube-reserved` based on usage heuristics.
|
||||||
|
* If absolutely necessary, enforce `system-reserved` over time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The resource requirements of kube system daemons may grow over time as more and
|
||||||
|
more features are added. Over time, kubernetes project will attempt to bring
|
||||||
|
down utilization of node system daemons, but that is not a priority as of now.
|
||||||
|
So expect a drop in `Allocatable` capacity in future releases.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Example Scenario
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Here is an example to illustrate Node Allocatable computation:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Node has `32Gi` of `memory` and `16 CPUs`
|
||||||
|
* `--kube-reserved` is set to `cpu=1,memory=2Gi`
|
||||||
|
* `--system-reserved` is set to `cpu=500m,memory=1Gi`
|
||||||
|
* `--eviction-hard` is set to `memory.available<500Mi`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Under this scenario, `Allocatable` will be `14.5 CPUs` & `28.5Gi` of memory.
|
||||||
|
Scheduler ensures that the total `requests` across all pods on this node does
|
||||||
|
not exceed `28.5Gi`. Kubelet evicts pods whenever the overall memory usage
|
||||||
|
exceeds across pods exceed `28.5Gi`. If all processes on the node consume as
|
||||||
|
much CPU as they can, pods together cannot consume more than `14.5 CPUs`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If `kube-reserved` and/or `system-reserved` is not enforced and system daemons
|
||||||
|
exceed their reservation, `kubelet` evicts pods whenever the overall node memory
|
||||||
|
usage is higher than `31.5Gi`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Feature Availability
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As of Kubernetes version 1.2, it has been possible to **optionally** specify
|
||||||
|
`kube-reserved` and `system-reserved` reservations. The scheduler switched to
|
||||||
|
using `Allocatable` instead of `Capacity` when available in the same release.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As of Kubernetes version 1.6, `eviction-thresholds` are being considered by
|
||||||
|
computing `Allocatable`. To revert to the old behavior set
|
||||||
|
`--experimental-allocatable-ignore-eviction` kubelet flag to `true`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As of Kubernetes version 1.6, `kubelet` enforces `Allocatable` on pods using
|
||||||
|
control groups. To revert to the old behavior unset `--enforce-node-allocatable`
|
||||||
|
kubelet flag. Note that unless `--kube-reserved`, or `--system-reserved` or
|
||||||
|
`--eviction-hard` flags have non-default values, `Allocatable` enforcement does
|
||||||
|
not affect existing deployments.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As of Kubernetes version 1.6, `kubelet` launches pods in their own cgroup
|
||||||
|
sandbox in a dedicated part of the cgroup hierarchy it manages. Operators are
|
||||||
|
required to drain their nodes prior to upgrade of the `kubelet` from prior
|
||||||
|
versions in order to ensure pods and their associated containers are launched in
|
||||||
|
the proper part of the cgroup hierarchy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user