Remove problems in DaemonSet fixed by controllerRef
The sentence describes a problem that's solved by the introduction of controllerRef (ownerRef with controller==true) feature. Removing it.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -87,12 +87,6 @@ When the two are specified the result is ANDed.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
If the `.spec.selector` is specified, it must match the `.spec.template.metadata.labels`. Config with these not matching will be rejected by the API.
|
If the `.spec.selector` is specified, it must match the `.spec.template.metadata.labels`. Config with these not matching will be rejected by the API.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Also you should not normally create any Pods whose labels match this selector, either directly, via
|
|
||||||
another DaemonSet, or via another workload resource such as ReplicaSet. Otherwise, the DaemonSet
|
|
||||||
{{< glossary_tooltip term_id="controller" >}} will think that those Pods were created by it.
|
|
||||||
Kubernetes will not stop you from doing this. One case where you might want to do this is manually
|
|
||||||
create a Pod with a different value on a node for testing.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Running Pods on select Nodes
|
### Running Pods on select Nodes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you specify a `.spec.template.spec.nodeSelector`, then the DaemonSet controller will
|
If you specify a `.spec.template.spec.nodeSelector`, then the DaemonSet controller will
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user