revised to minumize usage of whitelist/blacklist
This commit is contained in:
@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ __podSelector__: Each NetworkPolicy includes a `podSelector` which selects the g
|
||||
|
||||
__policyTypes__: Each NetworkPolicy includes a `policyTypes` list which may include either `Ingress`, `Egress`, or both. The `policyTypes` field indicates whether or not the given policy applies to ingress traffic to selected pod, egress traffic from selected pods, or both. If no `policyTypes` are specified on a NetworkPolicy then by default `Ingress` will always be set and `Egress` will be set if the NetworkPolicy has any egress rules.
|
||||
|
||||
__ingress__: Each NetworkPolicy may include a list of whitelist `ingress` rules. Each rule allows traffic which matches both the `from` and `ports` sections. The example policy contains a single rule, which matches traffic on a single port, from one of three sources, the first specified via an `ipBlock`, the second via a `namespaceSelector` and the third via a `podSelector`.
|
||||
__ingress__: Each NetworkPolicy may include a list of allowed `ingress` rules. Each rule allows traffic which matches both the `from` and `ports` sections. The example policy contains a single rule, which matches traffic on a single port, from one of three sources, the first specified via an `ipBlock`, the second via a `namespaceSelector` and the third via a `podSelector`.
|
||||
|
||||
__egress__: Each NetworkPolicy may include a list of whitelist `egress` rules. Each rule allows traffic which matches both the `to` and `ports` sections. The example policy contains a single rule, which matches traffic on a single port to any destination in `10.0.0.0/24`.
|
||||
__egress__: Each NetworkPolicy may include a list of allowed `egress` rules. Each rule allows traffic which matches both the `to` and `ports` sections. The example policy contains a single rule, which matches traffic on a single port to any destination in `10.0.0.0/24`.
|
||||
|
||||
So, the example NetworkPolicy:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user