Add scheduler concept guide (#14637)
* Add scheduler concept page * Rename scheduling overview * Fix non-ASCII colon symbols * Reword scheduler concept page * Move scheduler performance tuning into scheduling * Signpost from overview to kube-scheduler, etc * Add whatsnext section to scheduler concept * Restructure scheduling concept Now there's a concept page for scheduling, some of the details in the performance tuning page can have a better home. * Omit link to (unwritten) scheduling extensions page * Drop deprecated / superseded filtering rules
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Kubernetes Prow Robot
parent
6b0711ae01
commit
d550d112af
@@ -1,118 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- bsalamat
|
||||
title: Scheduler Performance Tuning
|
||||
content_template: templates/concept
|
||||
weight: 70
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{% capture overview %}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{< feature-state for_k8s_version="1.14" state="beta" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
Kube-scheduler is the Kubernetes default scheduler. It is responsible for
|
||||
placement of Pods on Nodes in a cluster. Nodes in a cluster that meet the
|
||||
scheduling requirements of a Pod are called "feasible" Nodes for the Pod. The
|
||||
scheduler finds feasible Nodes for a Pod and then runs a set of functions to
|
||||
score the feasible Nodes and picks a Node with the highest score among the
|
||||
feasible ones to run the Pod. The scheduler then notifies the API server about
|
||||
this decision in a process called "Binding".
|
||||
|
||||
{{% /capture %}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{% capture body %}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Percentage of Nodes to Score
|
||||
|
||||
Before Kubernetes 1.12, Kube-scheduler used to check the feasibility of all
|
||||
nodes in a cluster and then scored the feasible ones. Kubernetes 1.12 added a
|
||||
new feature that allows the scheduler to stop looking for more feasible nodes
|
||||
once it finds a certain number of them. This improves the scheduler's
|
||||
performance in large clusters. The number is specified as a percentage of the
|
||||
cluster size. The percentage can be controlled by a configuration option called
|
||||
`percentageOfNodesToScore`. The range should be between 1 and 100. Larger values
|
||||
are considered as 100%. Zero is equivalent to not providing the config option.
|
||||
Kubernetes 1.14 has logic to find the percentage of nodes to score based on the
|
||||
size of the cluster if it is not specified in the configuration. It uses a
|
||||
linear formula which yields 50% for a 100-node cluster. The formula yields 10%
|
||||
for a 5000-node cluster. The lower bound for the automatic value is 5%. In other
|
||||
words, the scheduler always scores at least 5% of the cluster no matter how
|
||||
large the cluster is, unless the user provides the config option with a value
|
||||
smaller than 5.
|
||||
|
||||
Below is an example configuration that sets `percentageOfNodesToScore` to 50%.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: kubescheduler.config.k8s.io/v1alpha1
|
||||
kind: KubeSchedulerConfiguration
|
||||
algorithmSource:
|
||||
provider: DefaultProvider
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
percentageOfNodesToScore: 50
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
{{< note >}} In clusters with less than 50 feasible nodes, the scheduler still
|
||||
checks all the nodes, simply because there are not enough feasible nodes to stop
|
||||
the scheduler's search early. {{< /note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
**To disable this feature**, you can set `percentageOfNodesToScore` to 100.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tuning percentageOfNodesToScore
|
||||
|
||||
`percentageOfNodesToScore` must be a value between 1 and 100 with the default
|
||||
value being calculated based on the cluster size. There is also a hardcoded
|
||||
minimum value of 50 nodes. This means that changing
|
||||
this option to lower values in clusters with several hundred nodes will not have
|
||||
much impact on the number of feasible nodes that the scheduler tries to find.
|
||||
This is intentional as this option is unlikely to improve performance noticeably
|
||||
in smaller clusters. In large clusters with over a 1000 nodes setting this value
|
||||
to lower numbers may show a noticeable performance improvement.
|
||||
|
||||
An important note to consider when setting this value is that when a smaller
|
||||
number of nodes in a cluster are checked for feasibility, some nodes are not
|
||||
sent to be scored for a given Pod. As a result, a Node which could possibly
|
||||
score a higher value for running the given Pod might not even be passed to the
|
||||
scoring phase. This would result in a less than ideal placement of the Pod. For
|
||||
this reason, the value should not be set to very low percentages. A general rule
|
||||
of thumb is to never set the value to anything lower than 10. Lower values
|
||||
should be used only when the scheduler's throughput is critical for your
|
||||
application and the score of nodes is not important. In other words, you prefer
|
||||
to run the Pod on any Node as long as it is feasible.
|
||||
|
||||
If your cluster has several hundred Nodes or fewer, we do not recommend lowering
|
||||
the default value of this configuration option. It is unlikely to improve the
|
||||
scheduler's performance significantly.
|
||||
|
||||
### How the scheduler iterates over Nodes
|
||||
|
||||
This section is intended for those who want to understand the internal details
|
||||
of this feature.
|
||||
|
||||
In order to give all the Nodes in a cluster a fair chance of being considered
|
||||
for running Pods, the scheduler iterates over the nodes in a round robin
|
||||
fashion. You can imagine that Nodes are in an array. The scheduler starts from
|
||||
the start of the array and checks feasibility of the nodes until it finds enough
|
||||
Nodes as specified by `percentageOfNodesToScore`. For the next Pod, the
|
||||
scheduler continues from the point in the Node array that it stopped at when
|
||||
checking feasibility of Nodes for the previous Pod.
|
||||
|
||||
If Nodes are in multiple zones, the scheduler iterates over Nodes in various
|
||||
zones to ensure that Nodes from different zones are considered in the
|
||||
feasibility checks. As an example, consider six nodes in two zones:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Zone 1: Node 1, Node 2, Node 3, Node 4
|
||||
Zone 2: Node 5, Node 6
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The Scheduler evaluates feasibility of the nodes in this order:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Node 1, Node 5, Node 2, Node 6, Node 3, Node 4
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
After going over all the Nodes, it goes back to Node 1.
|
||||
|
||||
{{% /capture %}}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user