Fix some links in the concepts section
This PR fixes the links in the concepts section. Most of the links are not dead links in English version because there are redirects for them. However, these links will be broken when localized to any languages other English. Where appropriate. this PR also wraps some long lines which are unfriendly to any localization team that try to catch the differences between revisions.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ the `--max-requests-inflight` flag without the API Priority and
|
||||
Fairness feature enabled.
|
||||
{{< /caution >}}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- body -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Enabling/Disabling API Priority and Fairness
|
||||
@@ -65,6 +63,7 @@ The command-line flag `--enable-priority-and-fairness=false` will disable the
|
||||
API Priority and Fairness feature, even if other flags have enabled it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
There are several distinct features involved in the API Priority and Fairness
|
||||
feature. Incoming requests are classified by attributes of the request using
|
||||
_FlowSchemas_, and assigned to priority levels. Priority levels add a degree of
|
||||
@@ -75,12 +74,13 @@ each other, and allows for requests to be queued to prevent bursty traffic from
|
||||
causing failed requests when the average load is acceptably low.
|
||||
|
||||
### Priority Levels
|
||||
Without APF enabled, overall concurrency in
|
||||
the API server is limited by the `kube-apiserver` flags
|
||||
`--max-requests-inflight` and `--max-mutating-requests-inflight`. With APF
|
||||
enabled, the concurrency limits defined by these flags are summed and then the sum is divided up
|
||||
among a configurable set of _priority levels_. Each incoming request is assigned
|
||||
to a single priority level, and each priority level will only dispatch as many
|
||||
|
||||
Without APF enabled, overall concurrency in the API server is limited by the
|
||||
`kube-apiserver` flags `--max-requests-inflight` and
|
||||
`--max-mutating-requests-inflight`. With APF enabled, the concurrency limits
|
||||
defined by these flags are summed and then the sum is divided up among a
|
||||
configurable set of _priority levels_. Each incoming request is assigned to a
|
||||
single priority level, and each priority level will only dispatch as many
|
||||
concurrent requests as its configuration allows.
|
||||
|
||||
The default configuration, for example, includes separate priority levels for
|
||||
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ requests cannot prevent leader election or actions by the built-in controllers
|
||||
from succeeding.
|
||||
|
||||
### Queuing
|
||||
|
||||
Even within a priority level there may be a large number of distinct sources of
|
||||
traffic. In an overload situation, it is valuable to prevent one stream of
|
||||
requests from starving others (in particular, in the relatively common case of a
|
||||
@@ -114,15 +115,18 @@ independent flows will all make progress when total traffic exceeds capacity),
|
||||
tolerance for bursty traffic, and the added latency induced by queuing.
|
||||
|
||||
### Exempt requests
|
||||
|
||||
Some requests are considered sufficiently important that they are not subject to
|
||||
any of the limitations imposed by this feature. These exemptions prevent an
|
||||
improperly-configured flow control configuration from totally disabling an API
|
||||
server.
|
||||
|
||||
## Defaults
|
||||
|
||||
The Priority and Fairness feature ships with a suggested configuration that
|
||||
should suffice for experimentation; if your cluster is likely to
|
||||
experience heavy load then you should consider what configuration will work best. The suggested configuration groups requests into five priority
|
||||
experience heavy load then you should consider what configuration will work
|
||||
best. The suggested configuration groups requests into five priority
|
||||
classes:
|
||||
|
||||
* The `system` priority level is for requests from the `system:nodes` group,
|
||||
@@ -180,19 +184,18 @@ If you add the following additional FlowSchema, this exempts those
|
||||
requests from rate limiting.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< caution >}}
|
||||
|
||||
Making this change also allows any hostile party to then send
|
||||
health-check requests that match this FlowSchema, at any volume they
|
||||
like. If you have a web traffic filter or similar external security
|
||||
mechanism to protect your cluster's API server from general internet
|
||||
traffic, you can configure rules to block any health check requests
|
||||
that originate from outside your cluster.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< /caution >}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{< codenew file="priority-and-fairness/health-for-strangers.yaml" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Resources
|
||||
|
||||
The flow control API involves two kinds of resources.
|
||||
[PriorityLevelConfigurations](/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/{{< param "version" >}}/#prioritylevelconfiguration-v1beta1-flowcontrol-apiserver-k8s-io)
|
||||
define the available isolation classes, the share of the available concurrency
|
||||
@@ -204,6 +207,7 @@ of the same API group, and it has the same Kinds with the same syntax and
|
||||
semantics.
|
||||
|
||||
### PriorityLevelConfiguration
|
||||
|
||||
A PriorityLevelConfiguration represents a single isolation class. Each
|
||||
PriorityLevelConfiguration has an independent limit on the number of outstanding
|
||||
requests, and limitations on the number of queued requests.
|
||||
@@ -217,6 +221,7 @@ server by restarting `kube-apiserver` with a different value for
|
||||
`--max-requests-inflight` (or `--max-mutating-requests-inflight`), and all
|
||||
PriorityLevelConfigurations will see their maximum allowed concurrency go up (or
|
||||
down) by the same fraction.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< caution >}}
|
||||
With the Priority and Fairness feature enabled, the total concurrency limit for
|
||||
the server is set to the sum of `--max-requests-inflight` and
|
||||
@@ -235,8 +240,8 @@ above the threshold will be queued, with the shuffle sharding and fair queuing t
|
||||
to balance progress between request flows.
|
||||
|
||||
The queuing configuration allows tuning the fair queuing algorithm for a
|
||||
priority level. Details of the algorithm can be read in the [enhancement
|
||||
proposal](#whats-next), but in short:
|
||||
priority level. Details of the algorithm can be read in the
|
||||
[enhancement proposal](#whats-next), but in short:
|
||||
|
||||
* Increasing `queues` reduces the rate of collisions between different flows, at
|
||||
the cost of increased memory usage. A value of 1 here effectively disables the
|
||||
@@ -249,15 +254,15 @@ proposal](#whats-next), but in short:
|
||||
* Changing `handSize` allows you to adjust the probability of collisions between
|
||||
different flows and the overall concurrency available to a single flow in an
|
||||
overload situation.
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
A larger `handSize` makes it less likely for two individual flows to collide
|
||||
(and therefore for one to be able to starve the other), but more likely that
|
||||
a small number of flows can dominate the apiserver. A larger `handSize` also
|
||||
potentially increases the amount of latency that a single high-traffic flow
|
||||
can cause. The maximum number of queued requests possible from a
|
||||
single flow is `handSize * queueLengthLimit`.
|
||||
{{< /note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
A larger `handSize` makes it less likely for two individual flows to collide
|
||||
(and therefore for one to be able to starve the other), but more likely that
|
||||
a small number of flows can dominate the apiserver. A larger `handSize` also
|
||||
potentially increases the amount of latency that a single high-traffic flow
|
||||
can cause. The maximum number of queued requests possible from a
|
||||
single flow is `handSize * queueLengthLimit`.
|
||||
{{< /note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
Following is a table showing an interesting collection of shuffle
|
||||
sharding configurations, showing for each the probability that a
|
||||
@@ -319,6 +324,7 @@ considered part of a single flow. The correct choice for a given FlowSchema
|
||||
depends on the resource and your particular environment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Diagnostics
|
||||
|
||||
Every HTTP response from an API server with the priority and fairness feature
|
||||
enabled has two extra headers: `X-Kubernetes-PF-FlowSchema-UID` and
|
||||
`X-Kubernetes-PF-PriorityLevel-UID`, noting the flow schema that matched the request
|
||||
@@ -356,13 +362,14 @@ poorly-behaved workloads that may be harming system health.
|
||||
matched the request), `priority_level` (indicating the one to which
|
||||
the request was assigned), and `reason`. The `reason` label will be
|
||||
have one of the following values:
|
||||
* `queue-full`, indicating that too many requests were already
|
||||
queued,
|
||||
* `concurrency-limit`, indicating that the
|
||||
PriorityLevelConfiguration is configured to reject rather than
|
||||
queue excess requests, or
|
||||
* `time-out`, indicating that the request was still in the queue
|
||||
when its queuing time limit expired.
|
||||
|
||||
* `queue-full`, indicating that too many requests were already
|
||||
queued,
|
||||
* `concurrency-limit`, indicating that the
|
||||
PriorityLevelConfiguration is configured to reject rather than
|
||||
queue excess requests, or
|
||||
* `time-out`, indicating that the request was still in the queue
|
||||
when its queuing time limit expired.
|
||||
|
||||
* `apiserver_flowcontrol_dispatched_requests_total` is a counter
|
||||
vector (cumulative since server start) of requests that began
|
||||
@@ -430,14 +437,15 @@ poorly-behaved workloads that may be harming system health.
|
||||
sample to its histogram, reporting the length of the queue immediately
|
||||
after the request was added. Note that this produces different
|
||||
statistics than an unbiased survey would.
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
An outlier value in a histogram here means it is likely that a single flow
|
||||
(i.e., requests by one user or for one namespace, depending on
|
||||
configuration) is flooding the API server, and being throttled. By contrast,
|
||||
if one priority level's histogram shows that all queues for that priority
|
||||
level are longer than those for other priority levels, it may be appropriate
|
||||
to increase that PriorityLevelConfiguration's concurrency shares.
|
||||
{{< /note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
An outlier value in a histogram here means it is likely that a single flow
|
||||
(i.e., requests by one user or for one namespace, depending on
|
||||
configuration) is flooding the API server, and being throttled. By contrast,
|
||||
if one priority level's histogram shows that all queues for that priority
|
||||
level are longer than those for other priority levels, it may be appropriate
|
||||
to increase that PriorityLevelConfiguration's concurrency shares.
|
||||
{{< /note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
* `apiserver_flowcontrol_request_concurrency_limit` is a gauge vector
|
||||
holding the computed concurrency limit (based on the API server's
|
||||
@@ -450,12 +458,13 @@ poorly-behaved workloads that may be harming system health.
|
||||
`priority_level` (indicating the one to which the request was
|
||||
assigned), and `execute` (indicating whether the request started
|
||||
executing).
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
Since each FlowSchema always assigns requests to a single
|
||||
PriorityLevelConfiguration, you can add the histograms for all the
|
||||
FlowSchemas for one priority level to get the effective histogram for
|
||||
requests assigned to that priority level.
|
||||
{{< /note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
Since each FlowSchema always assigns requests to a single
|
||||
PriorityLevelConfiguration, you can add the histograms for all the
|
||||
FlowSchemas for one priority level to get the effective histogram for
|
||||
requests assigned to that priority level.
|
||||
{{< /note >}}
|
||||
|
||||
* `apiserver_flowcontrol_request_execution_seconds` is a histogram
|
||||
vector of how long requests took to actually execute, broken down by
|
||||
@@ -465,14 +474,19 @@ poorly-behaved workloads that may be harming system health.
|
||||
|
||||
### Debug endpoints
|
||||
|
||||
When you enable the API Priority and Fairness feature, the kube-apiserver serves the following additional paths at its HTTP[S] ports.
|
||||
When you enable the API Priority and Fairness feature, the `kube-apiserver`
|
||||
serves the following additional paths at its HTTP[S] ports.
|
||||
|
||||
- `/debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_priority_levels` - a listing of
|
||||
all the priority levels and the current state of each. You can fetch like this:
|
||||
|
||||
- `/debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_priority_levels` - a listing of all the priority levels and the current state of each. You can fetch like this:
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
kubectl get --raw /debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_priority_levels
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The output is similar to this:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```none
|
||||
PriorityLevelName, ActiveQueues, IsIdle, IsQuiescing, WaitingRequests, ExecutingRequests,
|
||||
workload-low, 0, true, false, 0, 0,
|
||||
global-default, 0, true, false, 0, 0,
|
||||
@@ -483,12 +497,16 @@ When you enable the API Priority and Fairness feature, the kube-apiserver serves
|
||||
workload-high, 0, true, false, 0, 0,
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- `/debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_queues` - a listing of all the queues and their current state. You can fetch like this:
|
||||
- `/debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_queues` - a listing of all the
|
||||
queues and their current state. You can fetch like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
kubectl get --raw /debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_queues
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The output is similar to this:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```none
|
||||
PriorityLevelName, Index, PendingRequests, ExecutingRequests, VirtualStart,
|
||||
workload-high, 0, 0, 0, 0.0000,
|
||||
workload-high, 1, 0, 0, 0.0000,
|
||||
@@ -498,25 +516,33 @@ When you enable the API Priority and Fairness feature, the kube-apiserver serves
|
||||
leader-election, 15, 0, 0, 0.0000,
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- `/debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_requests` - a listing of all the requests that are currently waiting in a queue. You can fetch like this:
|
||||
- `/debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_requests` - a listing of all the requests
|
||||
that are currently waiting in a queue. You can fetch like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
kubectl get --raw /debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_requests
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The output is similar to this:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```none
|
||||
PriorityLevelName, FlowSchemaName, QueueIndex, RequestIndexInQueue, FlowDistingsher, ArriveTime,
|
||||
exempt, <none>, <none>, <none>, <none>, <none>,
|
||||
system, system-nodes, 12, 0, system:node:127.0.0.1, 2020-07-23T15:26:57.179170694Z,
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the queued requests, the output includes one phantom line for each priority level that is exempt from limitation.
|
||||
In addition to the queued requests, the output includes one phantom line
|
||||
for each priority level that is exempt from limitation.
|
||||
|
||||
You can get a more detailed listing with a command like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
kubectl get --raw '/debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_requests?includeRequestDetails=1'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The output is similar to this:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```none
|
||||
PriorityLevelName, FlowSchemaName, QueueIndex, RequestIndexInQueue, FlowDistingsher, ArriveTime, UserName, Verb, APIPath, Namespace, Name, APIVersion, Resource, SubResource,
|
||||
system, system-nodes, 12, 0, system:node:127.0.0.1, 2020-07-23T15:31:03.583823404Z, system:node:127.0.0.1, create, /api/v1/namespaces/scaletest/configmaps,
|
||||
system, system-nodes, 12, 1, system:node:127.0.0.1, 2020-07-23T15:31:03.594555947Z, system:node:127.0.0.1, create, /api/v1/namespaces/scaletest/configmaps,
|
||||
@@ -528,4 +554,4 @@ When you enable the API Priority and Fairness feature, the kube-apiserver serves
|
||||
For background information on design details for API priority and fairness, see
|
||||
the [enhancement proposal](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-api-machinery/1040-priority-and-fairness).
|
||||
You can make suggestions and feature requests via [SIG API Machinery](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-api-machinery)
|
||||
or the feature's [slack channel](http://kubernetes.slack.com/messages/api-priority-and-fairness).
|
||||
or the feature's [slack channel](https://kubernetes.slack.com/messages/api-priority-and-fairness).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
title: Garbage collection for container images
|
||||
content_type: concept
|
||||
weight: 70
|
||||
@@ -7,12 +6,13 @@ weight: 70
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- overview -->
|
||||
|
||||
Garbage collection is a helpful function of kubelet that will clean up unused [images](/docs/concepts/containers/#container-images) and unused [containers](/docs/concepts/containers/). Kubelet will perform garbage collection for containers every minute and garbage collection for images every five minutes.
|
||||
|
||||
External garbage collection tools are not recommended as these tools can potentially break the behavior of kubelet by removing containers expected to exist.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Garbage collection is a helpful function of kubelet that will clean up unused
|
||||
[images](/docs/concepts/containers/#container-images) and unused
|
||||
[containers](/docs/concepts/containers/). Kubelet will perform garbage collection
|
||||
for containers every minute and garbage collection for images every five minutes.
|
||||
|
||||
External garbage collection tools are not recommended as these tools can potentially
|
||||
break the behavior of kubelet by removing containers expected to exist.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- body -->
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,10 +28,24 @@ threshold has been met.
|
||||
|
||||
## Container Collection
|
||||
|
||||
The policy for garbage collecting containers considers three user-defined variables. `MinAge` is the minimum age at which a container can be garbage collected. `MaxPerPodContainer` is the maximum number of dead containers every single
|
||||
pod (UID, container name) pair is allowed to have. `MaxContainers` is the maximum number of total dead containers. These variables can be individually disabled by setting `MinAge` to zero and setting `MaxPerPodContainer` and `MaxContainers` respectively to less than zero.
|
||||
The policy for garbage collecting containers considers three user-defined variables.
|
||||
`MinAge` is the minimum age at which a container can be garbage collected.
|
||||
`MaxPerPodContainer` is the maximum number of dead containers every single
|
||||
pod (UID, container name) pair is allowed to have.
|
||||
`MaxContainers` is the maximum number of total dead containers.
|
||||
These variables can be individually disabled by setting `MinAge` to zero and
|
||||
setting `MaxPerPodContainer` and `MaxContainers` respectively to less than zero.
|
||||
|
||||
Kubelet will act on containers that are unidentified, deleted, or outside of the boundaries set by the previously mentioned flags. The oldest containers will generally be removed first. `MaxPerPodContainer` and `MaxContainer` may potentially conflict with each other in situations where retaining the maximum number of containers per pod (`MaxPerPodContainer`) would go outside the allowable range of global dead containers (`MaxContainers`). `MaxPerPodContainer` would be adjusted in this situation: A worst case scenario would be to downgrade `MaxPerPodContainer` to 1 and evict the oldest containers. Additionally, containers owned by pods that have been deleted are removed once they are older than `MinAge`.
|
||||
Kubelet will act on containers that are unidentified, deleted, or outside of
|
||||
the boundaries set by the previously mentioned flags. The oldest containers
|
||||
will generally be removed first. `MaxPerPodContainer` and `MaxContainer` may
|
||||
potentially conflict with each other in situations where retaining the maximum
|
||||
number of containers per pod (`MaxPerPodContainer`) would go outside the
|
||||
allowable range of global dead containers (`MaxContainers`).
|
||||
`MaxPerPodContainer` would be adjusted in this situation: A worst case
|
||||
scenario would be to downgrade `MaxPerPodContainer` to 1 and evict the oldest
|
||||
containers. Additionally, containers owned by pods that have been deleted are
|
||||
removed once they are older than `MinAge`.
|
||||
|
||||
Containers that are not managed by kubelet are not subject to container garbage collection.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -40,18 +54,18 @@ Containers that are not managed by kubelet are not subject to container garbage
|
||||
You can adjust the following thresholds to tune image garbage collection with the following kubelet flags :
|
||||
|
||||
1. `image-gc-high-threshold`, the percent of disk usage which triggers image garbage collection.
|
||||
Default is 85%.
|
||||
Default is 85%.
|
||||
2. `image-gc-low-threshold`, the percent of disk usage to which image garbage collection attempts
|
||||
to free. Default is 80%.
|
||||
to free. Default is 80%.
|
||||
|
||||
You can customize the garbage collection policy through the following kubelet flags:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `minimum-container-ttl-duration`, minimum age for a finished container before it is
|
||||
garbage collected. Default is 0 minute, which means every finished container will be garbage collected.
|
||||
garbage collected. Default is 0 minute, which means every finished container will be garbage collected.
|
||||
2. `maximum-dead-containers-per-container`, maximum number of old instances to be retained
|
||||
per container. Default is 1.
|
||||
per container. Default is 1.
|
||||
3. `maximum-dead-containers`, maximum number of old instances of containers to retain globally.
|
||||
Default is -1, which means there is no global limit.
|
||||
Default is -1, which means there is no global limit.
|
||||
|
||||
Containers can potentially be garbage collected before their usefulness has expired. These containers
|
||||
can contain logs and other data that can be useful for troubleshooting. A sufficiently large value for
|
||||
@@ -77,10 +91,8 @@ Including:
|
||||
| `--low-diskspace-threshold-mb` | `--eviction-hard` or `eviction-soft` | eviction generalizes disk thresholds to other resources |
|
||||
| `--outofdisk-transition-frequency` | `--eviction-pressure-transition-period` | eviction generalizes disk pressure transition to other resources |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## {{% heading "whatsnext" %}}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
See [Configuring Out Of Resource Handling](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/out-of-resource/) for more details.
|
||||
See [Configuring Out Of Resource Handling](/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/node-pressure-eviction/)
|
||||
for more details.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user