Merge branch 'master' into patch-1

This commit is contained in:
Jared
2016-11-21 13:30:45 -08:00
committed by GitHub
44 changed files with 1241 additions and 120 deletions
+3 -2
View File
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ To use it,
* Write an application atop of the client-go clients. Note that client-go defines its own API objects, so if needed, please import API definitions from client-go rather than from the main repository, e.g., `import "k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api/v1"` is correct.
The Go client can use the same [kubeconfig file](/docs/user-guide/kubeconfig-file)
as the kubectl CLI does to locate and authenticate to the apiserver. See this [example](https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/examples/out-of-cluster.go):
as the kubectl CLI does to locate and authenticate to the apiserver. See this [example](https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/blob/master/examples/out-of-cluster/main.go):
```golang
import (
@@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ From within a pod the recommended ways to connect to API are:
in any container of the pod can access it. See this [example of using kubectl proxy
in a pod](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/{{page.githubbranch}}/examples/kubectl-container/).
- use the Go client library, and create a client using the `client.NewInCluster()` factory.
This handles locating and authenticating to the apiserver. [example](https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/examples/in-cluster.go)
This handles locating and authenticating to the apiserver. See this [example of using Go client
library in a pod](https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/blob/master/examples/in-cluster/main.go).
In each case, the credentials of the pod are used to communicate securely with the apiserver.
+62 -12
View File
@@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ healthy backend service endpoint at all times, even in the event of
pod, cluster,
availability zone or regional outages.
Note that in the
case of Google Cloud, the logical L7 load balancer is not a single physical device (which
would present both a single point of failure, and a single global
network routing choke point), but rather a [truly global, highly available
load balancing managed service](https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/),
globally reachable via a single, static IP address.
Note that in the case of Google Cloud, the logical L7 load balancer is
not a single physical device (which would present both a single point
of failure, and a single global network routing choke point), but
rather a
[truly global, highly available load balancing managed service](https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/),
globally reachable via a single, static IP address.
Clients inside your federated Kubernetes clusters (i.e. Pods) will be
automatically routed to the cluster-local shard of the Federated Service
@@ -86,13 +86,13 @@ You can create a federated ingress in any of the usual ways, for example using k
``` shell
kubectl --context=federation-cluster create -f myingress.yaml
```
For example ingress YAML configurations, see the [Ingress User Guide](/docs/user-guide/ingress/)
The '--context=federation-cluster' flag tells kubectl to submit the
request to the Federation API endpoint, with the appropriate
credentials. If you have not yet configured such a context, visit the
[federation admin guide](/docs/admin/federation/) or one of the
[administration tutorials](https://github.com/kelseyhightower/kubernetes-cluster-federation)
to find out how to do so. TODO: Update links
to find out how to do so.
As described above, the Federated Ingress will automatically create
and maintain matching Kubernetes ingresses in all of the clusters
@@ -147,17 +147,28 @@ Events:
2m 2m 1 {loadbalancer-controller } Normal CREATE ip: 130.211.5.194
```
Note the address of your Federated Ingress
Note that:
1. the address of your Federated Ingress
corresponds with the address of all of the
underlying Kubernetes ingresses (once these have been allocated - this
may take up to a few minutes).
Note also that we have not yet provisioned any backend Pods to receive
2. we have not yet provisioned any backend Pods to receive
the network traffic directed to this ingress (i.e. 'Service
Endpoints' behind the service backing the Ingress), so the Federated Ingress does not yet consider these to
be healthy shards and will not direct traffic to any of these clusters.
3. the federation control system will
automatically reconfigure the load balancer controllers in all of the
clusters in your federation to make them consistent, and allow
them to share global load balancers. But this reconfiguration can
only complete successfully if there are no pre-existing Ingresses in
those clusters (this is a safety feature to prevent accidental
breakage of existing ingresses). So to ensure that your federated
ingresses function correctly, either start with new, empty clusters, or make
sure that you delete (and recreate if necessary) all pre-existing
Ingresses in the clusters comprising your federation.
## Adding backend services and pods
#Adding backend services and pods
To render the underlying ingress shards healthy, we need to add
backend Pods behind the service upon which the Ingress is based. There are several ways to achieve this, but
@@ -175,6 +186,16 @@ kubectl --context=federation-cluster create -f services/nginx.yaml
kubectl --context=federation-cluster create -f myreplicaset.yaml
```
Note that in order for your federated ingress to work correctly on
Google Cloud, the node ports of all of the underlying cluster-local
services need to be identical. If you're using a federated service
this is easy to do. Simply pick a node port that is not already
being used in any of your clusters, and add that to the spec of your
federated service. If you do not specify a node port for your
federated service, each cluster will choose it's own node port for
its cluster-local shard of the service, and these will probably end
up being different, which is not what you want.
You can verify this by checking in each of the underlying clusters, for example:
``` shell
@@ -258,6 +279,35 @@ Check that:
`service-controller` or `replicaset-controller`,
errors in the output of `kubectl logs federation-controller-manager --namespace federation`).
#### I can create a federated ingress successfully, but request load is not correctly distributed across the underlying clusters
Check that:
1. the services underlying your federated ingress in each cluster have
identical node ports. See [above](#creating_a_federated_ingress) for further explanation.
2. the load balancer controllers in each of your clusters are of the
correct type ("GLBC") and have been correctly reconfigured by the
federation control plane to share a global GCE load balancer (this
should happen automatically). If they of the correct type, and
have been correctly reconfigured, the UID data item in the GLBC
configmap in each cluster will be identical across all clusters.
See
[the GLBC docs](https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/blob/master/ingress/controllers/gce/BETA_LIMITATIONS.md#changing-the-cluster-uid)
for further details.
If this is not the case, check the logs of your federation
controller manager to determine why this automated reconfiguration
might be failing.
3. no ingresses have been manually created in any of your clusters before the above
reconfiguration of the load balancer controller completed
successfully. Ingresses created before the reconfiguration of
your GLBC will interfere with the behavior of your federated
ingresses created after the reconfiguration (see
[the GLBC docs](https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/blob/master/ingress/controllers/gce/BETA_LIMITATIONS.md#changing-the-cluster-uid)
for further information. To remedy this,
delete any ingresses created before the cluster joined the
federation (and had it's GLBC reconfigured), and recreate them if
necessary.
#### This troubleshooting guide did not help me solve my problem
Please use one of our [support channels](http://kubernetes.io/docs/troubleshooting/) to seek assistance.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ on node N if node N has a label with key `failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone
such that there is at least one node in the cluster with key `failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone` and
value V that is running a pod that has a label with key "security" and value "S1".) The pod anti-affinity
rule says that the pod cannot schedule onto a node if that node is already running a pod with label
having key "security" and value "S2". (If the `topologyKey` were `failure-domain.beta.kuberntes.io/zone` then
having key "security" and value "S2". (If the `topologyKey` were `failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone` then
it would mean that the pod cannot schedule onto a node if that node is in the same zone as a pod with
label having key "security" and value "S2".) See the [design doc](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/design/podaffinity.md).
for many more examples of pod affinity and anti-affinity, both the `requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution`
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ vm-1 # printf "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n" | netcat vm-0.ub 80
It's worth exploring what just happened. Init containers run sequentially *before* the application container. In this example we used the init container to copy shared libraries from the rootfs, while preserving user installed packages across container restart.
```yaml
pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/init-containers: '[
pod.beta.kubernetes.io/init-containers: '[
{
"name": "rootfs",
"image": "ubuntu:15.10",
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ spec:
app: nginx
annotations:
pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized: "true"
pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/init-containers: '[
pod.beta.kubernetes.io/init-containers: '[
{
"name": "peerfinder",
"image": "gcr.io/google_containers/peer-finder:0.1",
+2 -2
View File
@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ The possible values for RestartPolicy are `Always`, `OnFailure`, or `Never`. If
Three types of controllers are currently available:
- Use a [`Job`](/docs/user-guide/jobs/) for pods which are expected to terminate (e.g. batch computations).
- Use a [`ReplicationController`](/docs/user-guide/replication-controller/) for pods which are not expected to
terminate (e.g. web servers).
- Use a [`ReplicationController`](/docs/user-guide/replication-controller/) or [`Deployment`](/docs/user-guide/deployments/)
for pods which are not expected to terminate (e.g. web servers).
- Use a [`DaemonSet`](/docs/admin/daemons/): Use for pods which need to run 1 per machine because they provide a
machine-specific system service.
If you are unsure whether to use ReplicationController or Daemon, then see [Daemon Set versus
+169
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
---
assignees:
- erictune
---
* TOC
{:toc}
In addition to having one or more main containers (or **app containers**), a
pod can also have one or more **init containers** which run before the app
containers. Init containers allow you to reduce and reorganize setup scripts
and "glue code".
## Overview
An init container is exactly like a regular container, except that it always
runs to completion and each init container must complete successfully before
the next one is started. If the init container fails, Kubernetes will restart
the pod until the init container succeeds. If a pod is marked as `RestartNever`,
the pod will fail if the init container fails.
You specify a container as an init container by adding an annotation
The annotation key is `pod.beta.kubernetes.io/init-containers`. The annotation
value is a JSON array of [objects of type `v1.Container`
](http://kubernetes.io/docs/api-reference/v1/definitions/#_v1_container)
Once the feature exits beta, the init containers will be specified on the Pod
Spec alongside the app `containers` array.
The status of the init containers is returned as another annotation -
`pod.beta.kubernetes.io/init-container-statuses` -- as an array of the
container statuses (similar to the `status.containerStatuses` field).
Init containers support all of the same features as normal containers,
including resource limits, volumes, and security settings. The resource
requests and limits for an init container are [handled slightly differently](
#resources). Init containers do not support readiness probes since they will
run to completion before the pod can be ready.
An init container has all of the fields of an app container.
If you specify multiple init containers for a pod, those containers run one at
a time in sequential order. Each must succeed before the next can run. Once all
init containers have run to completion, Kubernetes initializes the pod and runs
the application containers as usual.
## What are Init Containers Good For?
Because init containers have separate images from application containers, they
have some advantages for start-up related code. These include:
* they can contain utilities that are not desirable to include in the app container
image for security reasons,
* they can contain utilities or custom code for setup that is not present in an app
image. (No need to make an image `FROM` another image just to use a tool like
`sed`, `awk`, `python`, `dig`, etc during setup).
* the application image builder and the deployer roles can work independently without
the need to jointly build a single app image.
Because init containers have different filesystem view (Linux namespaces) from
app containers, they can be given access to Secrets that the app containers are
not able to access.
Since init containers run to completion before any app containers start, and
since app containers run in parallel, they provide an easier way to block or
delay the startup of application containers until some precondition is met.
Because init containers run in sequence and there can be multiple init containers,
they can be composed easily.
Here are some ideas for how to use init containers:
- Wait for a service to be created with a shell command like:
`for i in {1..100}; do sleep 1; if dig myservice; then exit 0; fi; exit 1`
- Register this pod with a remote server with a command like:
`curl -X POST http://$MANAGEMENT_SERVICE_HOST:$MANAGEMENT_SERVICE_PORT/register -d 'instance=$(POD_NAME)&ip=$(POD_IP)'`
using `POD_NAME` and `POD_IP` from the downward API.
- Wait for some time before starting the app container with a command like `sleep 60`.
- Clone a git repository into a volume
- Place values like a POD_IP into a configuration file, and run a template tool (e.g. jinja)
to generate a configuration file to be consumed by the main app contianer.
```
Complete usage examples can be found in the [PetSets
guide](docs/user-guide/petset/bootstrapping/index.md) and the [Production Pods
guide](/docs/user-guide/production-pods.md#handling-initialization).
## Detailed Behavior
Each pod may have 0..N init containers defined along with the existing
1..M app containers.
On startup of the pod, after the network and volumes are initialized, the init
containers are started in order. Each container must exit successfully before
the next is invoked. If a container fails to start (due to the runtime) or
exits with failure, it is retried according to the pod RestartPolicy, except
when the pod restart policy is RestartPolicyAlways, in which case just the init
containers use RestartPolicyOnFailure.
A pod cannot be ready until all init containers have succeeded. The ports on an
init container are not aggregated under a service. A pod that is being
initialized is in the `Pending` phase but should has a condition `Initializing`
set to `true`.
If the pod is [restarted](#pod-restart-reasons) all init containers must
execute again.
Changes to the init container spec are limited to the container image field.
Altering a init container image field is equivalent to restarting the pod.
Because init containers can be restarted, retried, or reexecuted, init container
code should be idempotent. In particular, code that writes to files on EmptyDirs
should be prepared for the possibility that an output file already exists.
An init container has all of the fields of an app container. The following
fields are prohibited from being used on init containers by validation:
* `readinessProbe` - init containers must exit for pod startup to continue,
are not included in rotation, and so cannot define readiness distinct from
completion.
Init container authors may use `activeDeadlineSeconds` on the pod and
`livenessProbe` on the container to prevent init containers from failing
forever. The active deadline includes init containers.
The name of each app and init container in a pod must be unique - it is a
validation error for any container to share a name.
### Resources
Given the ordering and execution for init containers, the following rules
for resource usage apply:
* The highest of any particular resource request or limit defined on all init
containers is the **effective init request/limit**
* The pod's **effective request/limit** for a resource is the higher of:
* sum of all app containers request/limit for a resource
* effective init request/limit for a resource
* Scheduling is done based on effective requests/limits, which means
init containers can reserve resources for initialization that are not used
during the life of the pod.
* QoS tier of the pod's **effective QoS tier** is the QoS tier for init containers
and app containers alike.
Quota and limits are applied based on the effective pod request and
limit.
Pod level cGroups are based on the effective pod request and limit, the
same as the scheduler.
## Pod Restart Reasons
A Pod may "restart", causing reexecution of init containers, for the following
reasons:
* An init container image is changed by a user updating the Pod Spec.
* App container image changes only restart the app container.
* The pod infrastructure container is restarted
* This is uncommon and would have to be done by someone with root access to nodes.
* All containers in a pod are terminated, requiring a restart (RestartPolicyAlways) AND the record of init container completion has been lost due to garbage collection.
## Support and compatibilty
A cluster with Kubelet and Apiserver version 1.4.0 or greater supports init
containers with the beta annotations. Support varies for other combinations of
Kubelet and Apiserver version; see the [release notes
](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) for details.
+2
View File
@@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ The status of the init containers is returned as another annotation - `pod.beta.
Init containers support all of the same features as normal containers, including resource limits, volumes, and security settings. The resource requests and limits for an init container are handled slightly different than normal containers since init containers are run one at a time instead of all at once - any limits or quotas will be applied based on the largest init container resource quantity, rather than as the sum of quantities. Init containers do not support readiness probes since they will run to completion before the pod can be ready.
[Complete Init Container Documentation](/docs/user-guide/pods/init-containers.md)
## Lifecycle hooks and termination notice
+1 -1
View File
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ can do a DNS SRV query for `"_http._tcp.my-service.my-ns"` to discover the port
number for `"http"`.
The Kubernetes DNS server is the only way to access services of type
`ExternalName`.
`ExternalName`. More information is available in the [DNS Admin Guide](http://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/dns/).
## Headless services
+1 -1
View File
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ The system adds fields in several ways:
- Some fields are added synchronously with creation of the resource and some are set asynchronously.
- For example: `metadata.uid` is set synchronously. (Read more about [metadata](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/devel/api-conventions.md#metadata)).
- For example, `status.hostIP` is set only after the pod has been scheduled. This often happens fast, but you may notice pods which do not have this set yet. This is called Late Initialization. (Read mode about [status](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/devel/api-conventions.md#spec-and-status) and [late initialization](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/devel/api-conventions.md#late-initialization) ).
- For example, `status.hostIP` is set only after the pod has been scheduled. This often happens fast, but you may notice pods which do not have this set yet. This is called Late Initialization. (Read more about [status](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/devel/api-conventions.md#spec-and-status) and [late initialization](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/devel/api-conventions.md#late-initialization)).
- Some fields are set to default values. Some defaults vary by cluster and some are fixed for the API at a certain version. (Read more about [defaulting](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/devel/api-conventions.md#defaulting)).
- For example, `spec.containers[0].imagePullPolicy` always defaults to `IfNotPresent` in api v1.
- For example, `spec.containers[0].resources.limits.cpu` may be defaulted to `100m` on some clusters, to some other value on others, and not defaulted at all on others.