Note on missing/incorrect labels and scheduler behaviour with pod anti-affinity (#8973)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ in the section [Interlude: built-in node labels](#interlude-built-in-node-labels
|
|||||||
processing which can slow down scheduling in large clusters significantly. We do
|
processing which can slow down scheduling in large clusters significantly. We do
|
||||||
not recommend using them in clusters larger than several hundred nodes.
|
not recommend using them in clusters larger than several hundred nodes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Note:** Pod anti-affinity requires nodes to be consistently labelled, i.e. every node in the cluster must have an appropriate label matching `topologyKey`. If some or all nodes are missing the speficied `topologyKey` label, it can lead to unintended behavior.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As with node affinity, there are currently two types of pod affinity and anti-affinity, called `requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution` and
|
As with node affinity, there are currently two types of pod affinity and anti-affinity, called `requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution` and
|
||||||
`preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution` which denote "hard" vs. "soft" requirements.
|
`preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution` which denote "hard" vs. "soft" requirements.
|
||||||
See the description in the node affinity section earlier.
|
See the description in the node affinity section earlier.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user