Revise Pod concept (#22603)

* Revise Pod concept

Adapt the existing Pod documentation to suit the Docsy theme, by
promoting the Pod concept itself to /docs/concepts/workloads/pods/

Following on from this, update the Pod Lifecycle page to cover the
lifecycle of a Pod and follow on directly from the Pod concept,
for readers keen to understand things in detail.

This change also removes the automatic contents list from the Pod
overview page. Instead, the new page links to all the pages
inside the Pod section.

* Update links to Pod concept

Link to updated content

* Incorporate Pod concept suggestions

Co-authored-by: Celeste Horgan <celeste@cncf.io>

* Revise StatefulSet suggestion for Pod concept

Co-authored-by: Celeste Horgan <celeste@cncf.io>

Co-authored-by: Celeste Horgan <celeste@cncf.io>
This commit is contained in:
Tim Bannister
2020-07-27 04:18:16 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent c80c9c40c1
commit 49eee8fd3d
31 changed files with 704 additions and 736 deletions
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ kubectl delete pods -l app=myapp
### Persistent Volumes
Deleting the Pods in a StatefulSet will not delete the associated volumes. This is to ensure that you have the chance to copy data off the volume before deleting it. Deleting the PVC after the pods have left the [terminating state](/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod/#termination-of-pods) might trigger deletion of the backing Persistent Volumes depending on the storage class and reclaim policy. You should never assume ability to access a volume after claim deletion.
Deleting the Pods in a StatefulSet will not delete the associated volumes. This is to ensure that you have the chance to copy data off the volume before deleting it. Deleting the PVC after the pods have terminated might trigger deletion of the backing Persistent Volumes depending on the storage class and reclaim policy. You should never assume ability to access a volume after claim deletion.
{{< note >}}
Use caution when deleting a PVC, as it may lead to data loss.