clean up use of word: just
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Attribute-based access control (ABAC) defines an access control paradigm whereby
|
||||
To enable `ABAC` mode, specify `--authorization-policy-file=SOME_FILENAME` and `--authorization-mode=ABAC` on startup.
|
||||
|
||||
The file format is [one JSON object per line](https://jsonlines.org/). There
|
||||
should be no enclosing list or map, just one map per line.
|
||||
should be no enclosing list or map, only one map per line.
|
||||
|
||||
Each line is a "policy object", where each such object is a map with the following
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ no
|
||||
exposes the API server authorization to external services. Other resources in
|
||||
this group include:
|
||||
|
||||
* `SubjectAccessReview` - Access review for any user, not just the current one. Useful for delegating authorization decisions to the API server. For example, the kubelet and extension API servers use this to determine user access to their own APIs.
|
||||
* `SubjectAccessReview` - Access review for any user, not only the current one. Useful for delegating authorization decisions to the API server. For example, the kubelet and extension API servers use this to determine user access to their own APIs.
|
||||
* `LocalSubjectAccessReview` - Like `SubjectAccessReview` but restricted to a specific namespace.
|
||||
* `SelfSubjectRulesReview` - A review which returns the set of actions a user can perform within a namespace. Useful for users to quickly summarize their own access, or for UIs to hide/show actions.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ data:
|
||||
users: []
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The `kubeconfig` member of the ConfigMap is a config file with just the cluster
|
||||
The `kubeconfig` member of the ConfigMap is a config file with only the cluster
|
||||
information filled out. The key thing being communicated here is the
|
||||
`certificate-authority-data`. This may be expanded in the future.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ status:
|
||||
|
||||
It's usual to set `status.conditions.reason` to a machine-friendly reason
|
||||
code using TitleCase; this is a convention but you can set it to anything
|
||||
you like. If you want to add a note just for human consumption, use the
|
||||
you like. If you want to add a note for human consumption, use the
|
||||
`status.conditions.message` field.
|
||||
|
||||
## Signing
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ the role that is granted to those subjects.
|
||||
1. A binding to a different role is a fundamentally different binding.
|
||||
Requiring a binding to be deleted/recreated in order to change the `roleRef`
|
||||
ensures the full list of subjects in the binding is intended to be granted
|
||||
the new role (as opposed to enabling accidentally modifying just the roleRef
|
||||
the new role (as opposed to enabling or accidentally modifying only the roleRef
|
||||
without verifying all of the existing subjects should be given the new role's
|
||||
permissions).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ as a cluster administrator, include rules for custom resources, such as those se
|
||||
or aggregated API servers, to extend the default roles.
|
||||
|
||||
For example: the following ClusterRoles let the "admin" and "edit" default roles manage the custom resource
|
||||
named CronTab, whereas the "view" role can perform just read actions on CronTab resources.
|
||||
named CronTab, whereas the "view" role can perform only read actions on CronTab resources.
|
||||
You can assume that CronTab objects are named `"crontabs"` in URLs as seen by the API server.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -185,9 +185,9 @@ systemd unit file perhaps) to enable the token file. See docs
|
||||
further details.
|
||||
|
||||
### Authorize kubelet to create CSR
|
||||
Now that the bootstrapping node is _authenticated_ as part of the `system:bootstrappers` group, it needs to be _authorized_ to create a certificate signing request (CSR) as well as retrieve it when done. Fortunately, Kubernetes ships with a `ClusterRole` with precisely these (and just these) permissions, `system:node-bootstrapper`.
|
||||
Now that the bootstrapping node is _authenticated_ as part of the `system:bootstrappers` group, it needs to be _authorized_ to create a certificate signing request (CSR) as well as retrieve it when done. Fortunately, Kubernetes ships with a `ClusterRole` with precisely these (and only these) permissions, `system:node-bootstrapper`.
|
||||
|
||||
To do this, you just need to create a `ClusterRoleBinding` that binds the `system:bootstrappers` group to the cluster role `system:node-bootstrapper`.
|
||||
To do this, you only need to create a `ClusterRoleBinding` that binds the `system:bootstrappers` group to the cluster role `system:node-bootstrapper`.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
# enable bootstrapping nodes to create CSR
|
||||
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ The important elements to note are:
|
||||
* `token`: the token to use
|
||||
|
||||
The format of the token does not matter, as long as it matches what kube-apiserver expects. In the above example, we used a bootstrap token.
|
||||
As stated earlier, _any_ valid authentication method can be used, not just tokens.
|
||||
As stated earlier, _any_ valid authentication method can be used, not only tokens.
|
||||
|
||||
Because the bootstrap `kubeconfig` _is_ a standard `kubeconfig`, you can use `kubectl` to generate it. To create the above example file:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
A Kubernetes {{< glossary_tooltip text="control plane" term_id="control-plane" >}} component
|
||||
that embeds cloud-specific control logic. The cloud controller manager lets you link your
|
||||
cluster into your cloud provider's API, and separates out the components that interact
|
||||
with that cloud platform from components that just interact with your cluster.
|
||||
with that cloud platform from components that only interact with your cluster.
|
||||
|
||||
<!--more-->
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ Other operations for exploring API resources:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
kubectl api-resources --namespaced=true # All namespaced resources
|
||||
kubectl api-resources --namespaced=false # All non-namespaced resources
|
||||
kubectl api-resources -o name # All resources with simple output (just the resource name)
|
||||
kubectl api-resources -o name # All resources with simple output (only the resource name)
|
||||
kubectl api-resources -o wide # All resources with expanded (aka "wide") output
|
||||
kubectl api-resources --verbs=list,get # All resources that support the "list" and "get" request verbs
|
||||
kubectl api-resources --api-group=extensions # All resources in the "extensions" API group
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ for example `create`, `get`, `describe`, `delete`.
|
||||
Flags that you specify from the command line override default values and any corresponding environment variables.
|
||||
{{< /caution >}}
|
||||
|
||||
If you need help, just run `kubectl help` from the terminal window.
|
||||
If you need help, run `kubectl help` from the terminal window.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operations
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ supported in API v1 must exist and function until API v1 is removed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Component config structures
|
||||
|
||||
Component configs are versioned and managed just like REST resources.
|
||||
Component configs are versioned and managed similar to REST resources.
|
||||
|
||||
### Future work
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -209,9 +209,8 @@ would have failed due to conflicting ownership.
|
||||
|
||||
The merging strategy, implemented with Server Side Apply, provides a generally
|
||||
more stable object lifecycle. Server Side Apply tries to merge fields based on
|
||||
the fact who manages them instead of overruling just based on values. This way
|
||||
it is intended to make it easier and more stable for multiple actors updating
|
||||
the same object by causing less unexpected interference.
|
||||
the actor who manages them instead of overruling based on values. This way
|
||||
multiple actors can update the same object without causing unexpected interference.
|
||||
|
||||
When a user sends a "fully-specified intent" object to the Server Side Apply
|
||||
endpoint, the server merges it with the live object favoring the value in the
|
||||
@@ -319,7 +318,7 @@ kubectl apply -f https://k8s.io/examples/application/ssa/nginx-deployment-replic
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the apply results in a conflict with the HPA controller, then do nothing. The
|
||||
conflict just indicates the controller has claimed the field earlier in the
|
||||
conflict indicates the controller has claimed the field earlier in the
|
||||
process than it sometimes does.
|
||||
|
||||
At this point the user may remove the `replicas` field from their configuration.
|
||||
@@ -436,7 +435,7 @@ Data: [{"op": "replace", "path": "/metadata/managedFields", "value": [{}]}]
|
||||
|
||||
This will overwrite the managedFields with a list containing a single empty
|
||||
entry that then results in the managedFields being stripped entirely from the
|
||||
object. Note that just setting the managedFields to an empty list will not
|
||||
object. Note that setting the managedFields to an empty list will not
|
||||
reset the field. This is on purpose, so managedFields never get stripped by
|
||||
clients not aware of the field.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user