Update Kuberbetes Blog URLs (#8612)
- blog.kubernetes.io => kubernetes.io/blog/ - Kubernetes blog => Kuberentes Blog - Remove *.html
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Kubernetes was the first external orchestration platform supported by [Rancher](
|
||||
|
||||
### Rancher and Kubernetes 1.2
|
||||
|
||||
Kubernetes 1.2 introduced enhanced Ingress object to simplify allowing inbound connections to reach the cluster services: here’s an excellent [blog post about ingress](http://blog.kubernetes.io/2016/03/Kubernetes-1.2-and-simplifying-advanced-networking-with-Ingress.html) policies. Ingress resource allows users to define host name routing rules and TLS config for the Load Balancer in a user friendly way. Then it should be backed up by an Ingress controller that would configure a corresponding cloud provider’s Load Balancer with the Ingress rules. Since Rancher already included a software defined Load Balancer based on HAproxy, we already supported all of the configuration requirements of the Ingress resource, and didn’t have to do any changes on the Rancher side to adopt Ingress. What we had to do was write an Ingress controller that would listen to Kubernetes ingress specific events, configure the Rancher Load Balancer accordingly, and propagate the Load Balancer public entry point back to Kubernetes:
|
||||
Kubernetes 1.2 introduced enhanced Ingress object to simplify allowing inbound connections to reach the cluster services: here’s an excellent [blog post about ingress](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2016/03/Kubernetes-1.2-and-simplifying-advanced-networking-with-Ingress) policies. Ingress resource allows users to define host name routing rules and TLS config for the Load Balancer in a user friendly way. Then it should be backed up by an Ingress controller that would configure a corresponding cloud provider’s Load Balancer with the Ingress rules. Since Rancher already included a software defined Load Balancer based on HAproxy, we already supported all of the configuration requirements of the Ingress resource, and didn’t have to do any changes on the Rancher side to adopt Ingress. What we had to do was write an Ingress controller that would listen to Kubernetes ingress specific events, configure the Rancher Load Balancer accordingly, and propagate the Load Balancer public entry point back to Kubernetes:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Then every underlying Kubernetes cluster represented by Rancher environment, sho
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- Kubernetes [cluster federation design doc](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/design/federation-phase-1.md)
|
||||
- Kubernetes [blog post on multi zone clusters](http://blog.kubernetes.io/2016/03/building-highly-available-applications-using-Kubernetes-new-multi-zone-clusters-a.k.a-Ubernetes-Lite.html)
|
||||
- Kubernetes [blog post on multi zone clusters](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2016/03/building-highly-available-applications-using-Kubernetes-new-multi-zone-clusters-a.k.a-Ubernetes-Lite)
|
||||
- Kubernetes [federated services design doc](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/design/federated-services.md)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user