Update links to proper repos
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Andrew Chen
parent
206a264c0e
commit
2e192598a0
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Objects of type `PodSecurityPolicy` govern the ability
|
||||
to make requests on a pod that affect the `SecurityContext` that will be
|
||||
applied to a pod and container.
|
||||
|
||||
See [PodSecurityPolicy proposal](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/security-context-constraints.md) for more information.
|
||||
See [PodSecurityPolicy proposal](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/design-proposals/security-context-constraints.md) for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
* TOC
|
||||
{:toc}
|
||||
@@ -203,4 +203,4 @@ following
|
||||
|
||||
In Kubernetes 1.5 and newer, you can use PodSecurityPolicy to control access to privileged containers based on user role and groups. Access to different PodSecurityPolicy objects can be controlled via authorization. To limit access to PodSecurityPolicy objects for pods created via a Deployment, ReplicaSet, etc, the [Controller Manager](/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/) must be run against the secured API port, and must not have superuser permissions.
|
||||
|
||||
PodSecurityPolicy authorization uses the union of all policies available to the user creating the pod and the service account specified on the pod. When pods are created via a Deployment, ReplicaSet, etc, it is Controller Manager that creates the pod, so if it is running against the unsecured API port, all PodSecurityPolicy objects would be allowed, and you could not effectively subdivide access. Access to given PSP policies for a user will be effective only when deploying Pods directly. For more details, see the [PodSecurityPolicy RBAC example](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/examples/podsecuritypolicy/rbac/README.md) of applying PodSecurityPolicy to control access to privileged containers based on role and groups when deploying Pods directly.
|
||||
PodSecurityPolicy authorization uses the union of all policies available to the user creating the pod and the service account specified on the pod. When pods are created via a Deployment, ReplicaSet, etc, it is Controller Manager that creates the pod, so if it is running against the unsecured API port, all PodSecurityPolicy objects would be allowed, and you could not effectively subdivide access. Access to given PSP policies for a user will be effective only when deploying Pods directly. For more details, see the [PodSecurityPolicy RBAC example](https://git.k8s.io/kubernetes/examples/podsecuritypolicy/rbac/README.md) of applying PodSecurityPolicy to control access to privileged containers based on role and groups when deploying Pods directly.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -240,4 +240,4 @@ See a [detailed example for how to use resource quota](/docs/tasks/configure-pod
|
||||
|
||||
## Read More
|
||||
|
||||
See [ResourceQuota design doc](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/{{page.githubbranch}}/docs/design/admission_control_resource_quota.md) for more information.
|
||||
See [ResourceQuota design doc](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/design-proposals/admission_control_resource_quota.md) for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user