[zh] Resync concepts section (7)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -74,18 +74,17 @@ ID([UID](/zh/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/names/#uids)),
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Pods do not, by themselves, self-heal. If a Pod is scheduled to a
|
||||
{{< glossary_tooltip text="node" term_id="node" >}} that then fails,
|
||||
or if the scheduling operation itself fails, the Pod is deleted; likewise, a Pod won't
|
||||
{{< glossary_tooltip text="node" term_id="node" >}} that then fails, the Pod is deleted; likewise, a Pod won't
|
||||
survive an eviction due to a lack of resources or Node maintenance. Kubernetes uses a
|
||||
higher-level abstraction, called a
|
||||
{{< glossary_tooltip term_id="controller" text="controller" >}}, that handles the work of
|
||||
managing the relatively disposable Pod instances.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
Pod 自身不具有自愈能力。如果 Pod 被调度到某{{< glossary_tooltip text="节点" term_id="node" >}}
|
||||
而该节点之后失效,或者调度操作本身失效,Pod 会被删除;与此类似,Pod 无法在节点资源
|
||||
耗尽或者节点维护期间继续存活。Kubernetes 使用一种高级抽象,称作
|
||||
{{< glossary_tooltip term_id="controller" text="控制器" >}},来管理这些相对而言
|
||||
可随时丢弃的 Pod 实例。
|
||||
而该节点之后失效,Pod 会被删除;类似地,Pod 无法在因节点资源
|
||||
耗尽或者节点维护而被驱逐期间继续存活。Kubernetes 使用一种高级抽象
|
||||
来管理这些相对而言可随时丢弃的 Pod 实例,称作
|
||||
{{< glossary_tooltip term_id="controller" text="控制器" >}}。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
A given Pod (as defined by a UID) is never "rescheduled" to a different node; instead,
|
||||
@@ -577,14 +576,14 @@ is different from the liveness probe.
|
||||
如果你希望容器能够自行进入维护状态,也可以指定一个就绪态探针,检查某个特定于
|
||||
就绪态的因此不同于存活态探测的端点。
|
||||
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
If you just want to be able to drain requests when the Pod is deleted, you do not
|
||||
If you want to be able to drain requests when the Pod is deleted, you do not
|
||||
necessarily need a readiness probe; on deletion, the Pod automatically puts itself
|
||||
into an unready state regardless of whether the readiness probe exists.
|
||||
The Pod remains in the unready state while it waits for the containers in the Pod
|
||||
to stop.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
{{< note >}}
|
||||
请注意,如果你只是想在 Pod 被删除时能够排空请求,则不一定需要使用就绪态探针;
|
||||
在删除 Pod 时,Pod 会自动将自身置于未就绪状态,无论就绪态探针是否存在。
|
||||
等待 Pod 中的容器停止期间,Pod 会一直处于未就绪状态。
|
||||
@@ -677,18 +676,6 @@ An example flow:
|
||||
On the node where the Pod is running: as soon as the kubelet sees that a Pod has been marked
|
||||
as terminating (a graceful shutdown duration has been set), the kubelet begins the local Pod
|
||||
shutdown process.
|
||||
|
||||
1. If one of the Pod's containers has defined a `preStop`
|
||||
[hook](/docs/concepts/containers/container-lifecycle-hooks/#hook-details), the kubelet
|
||||
runs that hook inside of the container. If the `preStop` hook is still running after the
|
||||
grace period expires, the kubelet requests a small, one-off grace period extension of 2
|
||||
seconds.
|
||||
If the `preStop` hook needs longer to complete than the default grace period allows,
|
||||
you must modify `terminationGracePeriodSeconds` to suit this.
|
||||
1. The kubelet triggers the container runtime to send a TERM signal to process 1 inside each
|
||||
container.
|
||||
The containers in the Pod receive the TERM signal at different times and in an arbitrary
|
||||
order. If the order of shutdowns matters, consider using a `preStop` hook to synchronize.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
下面是一个例子:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -701,6 +688,19 @@ An example flow:
|
||||
在 Pod 运行所在的节点上:`kubelet` 一旦看到 Pod
|
||||
被标记为正在终止(已经设置了体面终止限期),`kubelet` 即开始本地的 Pod 关闭过程。
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
1. If one of the Pod's containers has defined a `preStop`
|
||||
[hook](/docs/concepts/containers/container-lifecycle-hooks/#hook-details), the kubelet
|
||||
runs that hook inside of the container. If the `preStop` hook is still running after the
|
||||
grace period expires, the kubelet requests a small, one-off grace period extension of 2
|
||||
seconds.
|
||||
If the `preStop` hook needs longer to complete than the default grace period allows,
|
||||
you must modify `terminationGracePeriodSeconds` to suit this.
|
||||
1. The kubelet triggers the container runtime to send a TERM signal to process 1 inside each
|
||||
container.
|
||||
The containers in the Pod receive the TERM signal at different times and in an arbitrary
|
||||
order. If the order of shutdowns matters, consider using a `preStop` hook to synchronize.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
1. 如果 Pod 中的容器之一定义了 `preStop`
|
||||
[回调](/zh/docs/concepts/containers/container-lifecycle-hooks/#hook-details),
|
||||
`kubelet` 开始在容器内运行该回调逻辑。如果超出体面终止限期时,`preStop` 回调逻辑
|
||||
@@ -847,7 +847,6 @@ This avoids a resource leak as Pods are created and terminated over time.
|
||||
and
|
||||
[ContainerStatus](/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/{{< param "version" >}}/#containerstatus-v1-core).
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
* 动手实践[为容器生命周期时间关联处理程序](/zh/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/attach-handler-lifecycle-event/)。
|
||||
* 动手实践[配置存活态、就绪态和启动探针](/zh/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-liveness-readiness-startup-probes/)。
|
||||
* 进一步了解[容器生命周期回调](/zh/docs/concepts/containers/container-lifecycle-hooks/)。
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user