Fix identations in Conventions paragraph

This commit is contained in:
Tsahi Duek
2020-04-08 11:29:18 +03:00
committed by bryan
parent 2c71396223
commit 16a9707774
@@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ There are some implicit conventions worth noting here:
- Only the Pods holding the same namespace as the incoming Pod can be matching candidates. - Only the Pods holding the same namespace as the incoming Pod can be matching candidates.
- Nodes without `topologySpreadConstraints[*].topologyKey` present will be bypassed. It implies that: - Nodes without `topologySpreadConstraints[*].topologyKey` present will be bypassed. It implies that:
1. the Pods located on those nodes do not impact `maxSkew` calculation - in the above example, suppose "node1" does not have label "zone", then the 2 Pods will be disregarded, hence the incomingPod will be scheduled into "zoneA". 1. the Pods located on those nodes do not impact `maxSkew` calculation - in the above example, suppose "node1" does not have label "zone", then the 2 Pods will be disregarded, hence the incomingPod will be scheduled into "zoneA".
2. the incoming Pod has no chances to be scheduled onto this kind of nodes - in the above example, suppose a "node5" carrying label `{zone-typo: zoneC}` joins the cluster, it will be bypassed due to the absence of label key "zone". 2. the incoming Pod has no chances to be scheduled onto this kind of nodes - in the above example, suppose a "node5" carrying label `{zone-typo: zoneC}` joins the cluster, it will be bypassed due to the absence of label key "zone".
@@ -237,7 +236,7 @@ scheduled - more packed or more scattered.
The "EvenPodsSpread" feature provides flexible options to distribute Pods evenly across different The "EvenPodsSpread" feature provides flexible options to distribute Pods evenly across different
topology domains - to achieve high availability or cost-saving. This can also help on rolling update topology domains - to achieve high availability or cost-saving. This can also help on rolling update
workloads and scaling out replicas smoothly. workloads and scaling out replicas smoothly.
See [Motivation](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/20190221-pod-topology-spread.md#motivation) for more details. See [Motivation](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-scheduling/20190221-even-pods-spreading.md#motivation) for more details.
## Known Limitations ## Known Limitations